Laserfiche WebLink
<br />program, combined with inconclusive. evaluation results, the <br />State of Utah, Division of Water Resources (DWR) , granted <br />a contract to NAWC in 1977. to conduct a more detailed and <br />comprehensi ve design study to guide the future. development <br />of the Utah snowpack augmentation program. This design study <br />(Thompson et aI, 1978) considered various aspects of the program <br />including target areaselecion, ground and aerial sE~eding <br />techniques, and the specification of seedahility criteria. <br /> <br />2.1 Seedability Criteria <br /> <br />One of the most important aspects of a weather modifi(~ation <br />program is the specification of seedability criteria. Research <br />programs over the years have demonstrated that seeding clouds <br />can produce increases, but can also produce decreases as well, <br />depending upon atmospheric conditions and seeding techniques. <br />It is therefore necessary to develop criteria which will allow <br />seeding during favorable situations and suspension of seeding <br />during unfavorable situations. Fortunately; several federally <br />funded research seeding programs have been conducted over <br />the past 30 years which provide data for ,the establishment <br />of reasonable seeding criteria. <br /> <br />The major obstacle to direct adoption' of research rE!sul ts <br />to an operational program from relevant research programs <br />has been the question of transferability of results from one <br />geographical location to another. Scientists have recognized <br />for some time that seeding results vary from one area to another <br />depending upon such factors as the type and frequency of storms <br />( cloud climatology) affecting an area and the peculiarities <br />of a given region in terms of physical topography. Analyses <br />of various research programs have demonstrated that seeding <br />response appears to be tied to, among other parameters, the <br />2-3 <br />