Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1014 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br />A number of case studies have also been analyzed <br />from investigations in the Tushar mountain region of <br />southern Utah. Sassen et al. (1986) documented the <br />passage of a weak cold front over the Tushars and found <br />that supercooled water was present throughout the <br />storm except during the cold frontal passage. The max- <br />imum values of supercooled water occurred in the <br />postfrontal convective region of the storm, consistent <br />with our measurements of weak cold frontal passages <br />in the Sierra Nevada. Rauber and Grant (1987) doc- <br />umented the evolution of supercooled water during an <br />orographic storm associated with a weak cold front. <br />They also found supercooled water to be present con- <br />tinuously within this storm, although in this case, the <br />orographic clouds were prefrontal. The Tushar storm <br />discussed by Long (1986) was particularly interesting <br />because the same storm had affected the SCPP area <br />the day before (7-8 February 1985), and it was well <br />documented by both projects (see Reynolds and Ku- <br />ciauskas 1987). The storm discussed by Long had su- <br />percooled water evolution similar to that observed in <br />SCPP in the early prefrontal region, but differed sub- <br />stantially in the postfrontal region. In California, the <br />passage of the cold front resulted in a reduction in cloud <br />depth and a large increase in supercooled water over <br />the crestline. In Utah, the cold frontal passage was ac- <br />companied by a reduction in supercooled water. The <br />difference appeared related to prevailing wind direction <br />in the postfrontal region in the two areas. Over the <br />SCPP area, winds remained westerly (barrier perpen- <br />dicular) in the postfrontal region, while in Utah the <br />winds became northerly (barrier parallel), eliminating <br />orographic lift. <br />Radiometric measurements of supercooled water <br />have also been reported in a 3-year study over Colo- <br />rado's Grand Mesa by Super et al. (1986). These au- <br />thors provided a climatology of supercooled water <br />measurements similar to that in Fig. 23, but for I-h <br />averages. The magnitude and general characteristics of <br />the distribution of supercooled water measurements in <br />both locations were very similar, an interesting result <br />considering that the annual precipitation at the crest <br />of the Grand Mesa is only two-thirds of that measured <br />in the Sierra Nevada. <br /> <br />8. Implications for cloud seeding <br /> <br />Lastly, we discuss the implication of our results for <br />cloud seeding operations in the Sierra Nevada. The <br />success of cloud seeding, when used to augment pre- <br />cipitation, depends on many factors, one of which is <br />the presence of supercooled water. Our results indicate <br />that supercooled water is present in distinct regions of <br />Sierra Nevada storms. The location of these regions, <br />and the magnitude and duration of the presence of <br />supercooled water, depend strongly on the synoptic <br />scale structure, intensity, evolution, and trajectory of <br />the storms. <br />Since the duration of supercooled water in clouds is <br />typically 2-10 hours, it is important to be able to fore- <br /> <br />cast these events reliably in other to seed effectively. <br />The postfrontal regions of storms with zonal flow char- <br />acteristics appear to provide the best situation for fore- <br />casting supercooled water events, since the subsidence <br />region associated with a reduction in cloud depth is <br />often evident as a distinct high cloud boundary on sat- <br />ellite photographs. Identifying this boundary was one <br />of the primary forecasting techniques used operation- <br />ally during SCPP. Reynolds and Kuciauskas (1987) <br />have provided detailed analyses of the structure of the <br />atmosphere in the vicinity of this boundary using radar, <br />satellite, and other data. These authors showed that <br />radar and satellite may be used as a tool to predict the <br />onset of supercooled water events when storms. with <br />these characteristics impact the Sierra Nevada. How- <br />ever, the prefrontal regions of storms with meridional <br />flow characteristics are more difficult to forecast. The <br />lower clouds in these cases are frequently obscured by <br />cirrus clouds on satellite photographs, making the onset <br />of the storm difficult to predict. <br />In addition to the existence of supercooled water, <br />another important aspect of cloud seeding opportunity <br />is its magnitude. Seventy percent of the time that ra- <br />diometric measurements of supercooled water were <br />above background, values were below 0.20 mm (Fig. <br />23). Ninety percent of the time the measurements were <br />below 0.40 mm. It is not clear whether measurements <br />at or below these values represent true cloud seeding <br />opportunity. Definitive studies are still required to in- <br />terpret the meaning of these measurements clearly in <br />terms of the actual cloud supercooled water content. <br />To date, attempts at such studies have met with limited <br />success (see Heggli et al. 1987). <br /> <br /> 14000 <br /> 13000 <br /> 12000 <br /> 11000 <br /> 10000 <br />>- 9000 <br />u <br />z 8000 <br />w <br />::> <br />0 7000 <br />w <br />cr 6000 <br />II- <br /> 5000 <br /> 4000 <br /> 3000 <br /> 2000 <br /> 1000 <br /> 0 <br /> <br /> <br />IJJ <br />70~ <br />f! <br />Z <br />601JJ <br />(,) <br />cr <br />w <br />5OCl. <br /> <br />w <br />40~ <br />!i <br />305 <br />:::;: <br />::> <br />20(,) <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />80 <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />0.1 0,2 0.3 0.4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1.0 1.1 1,2 1.3 1.4 <br />INTEGRATED LIQUID WATER (mm) <br /> <br />FIG. 23. Frequency distribution ofIiquid water measurements from <br />1983-84 through 1986-87 with the dual-channel radiometer. The <br />measurements were made at 2-minute intervals. Only measurements <br />> 0.05 mm (background) were included in the analysis. The solid <br />line shows the percentage of measurements with values less than the <br />value on the abscissa. The database includes over 775 hours of ob- <br />servations during which liquid water was observed. <br /> <br />