Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1006 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br /> <br />"'~~ <br /> <br />.... ........................: : <br /> <br />/_-20 - ':i"<~L <br /> <br />,.- - <br /> <br />/I"'"'' <br />'\/ <br />/.> <br />/ i <br />>'\~" ...,;~:>.._,.... <br />13-15".' . ____i_./:~5__'~~ i["~"" <br />30- - - ~ - ~ 130 - - - - - - - 125 - - - - 120 ' <br /> <br />.'" . . <br />~~ =>{. ~'I\ <br />.;, .... ., .. <br />. ~:tIII"~90' <br />~..f-7!!i~.' <br /> <br />FIG. 13. As in Fig, 4, but for 1200 UTe 7 January 1985. <br />The satellite photograph was taken at 1400 UTe. <br /> <br />from 10 to 5 m S-I in the high relative humidity zone <br />below 3 km. After the front moved past Kingvale, pre- <br />cipitation averaged less than 0.5 mm h-1 for the next <br />15 h. Supercooled water amounts during this period <br />were near 0.05 mm with peaks to 0.50 mm associated <br /> <br />with embedded convection. The supercooled water <br />observed during this time was produced primarily by <br />convection. Orographic forcing was unlikely, based on <br />the low wind speeds in the moist layers of the atmo- <br />sphere. The center of the low circulation passed over <br /> <br />