Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1002 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br />II: 1.0 <br />"'- <br />t-e <br />~.! <br />0%0,5 ~ <br />:it: <br />2~ ~I ~. <br />..J 0,0 -- <br />Z 4 <br />~ <br />t!~ <br />ire 2 <br />2- <br />g: 0 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />09 <br /> <br />06 <br /> <br />03 (ff25) <br />TIME (UTe) <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />09 <br />(2/24) <br /> <br />FIG. 9. As in Fig. 6, but for 0900 UTC 24 February 1984 to 1500 UTC 25 February 1984. <br /> <br />rier-perpendicular orientation. However, in some cases, <br />this effect was not as important because it was accom- <br />panied by a reduction in wind speed. <br /> <br />c. Split flow in the middle troposphere associating with <br />a dissipating cyclonic storm: 22-23 December <br />1986 <br /> <br />The 22-23 December storm was a weak system that <br />produced only 16 mm of precipitation at Kingvale. <br />The storm was associated with the passage of a weak <br />cold front. Figure 10 shows an infrared satellite pho- <br />tograph of the storm for 1300 UTC 22 December and <br />the associated 500 mb chart at 1200. Time-height cross <br />sections of the storm from Lincoln are shown in Fig. <br />11. Figure 12 shows a time section of rawinsonde data <br />and the radiometric and precipitation data from King- <br />vale during the storm, as well as icing rate data. <br />The flow at 500 mb at 1200 was split, with the major <br />belt of the westerlies moving northward over a ridge <br />centered near the western United States. An occluded <br />storm, with rapidly rising central low pressure, was lo- <br />cated at 1350 W longitude off the coast of British Co- <br />lumbia. A weak and shallow cold front extended <br />southward through the latitude of the project area. A <br />wide region of thin cirrus was present over California <br />and Nevada ahead of the storm. No distinct upper- <br />level subsidence region was evident during the storm <br />passage. The jet stream remained north of the project <br />area. <br />Prior to the arrival of the cold front, a midlevel stra- <br />tus deck, 1.5-2.0 km thick, moved over the Sierra. This <br />deck appeared to be composed of supercooled water, <br />based on the radiometric measurements and the ab- <br />sence of precipitation. The surface front arrived at 1400 <br />at Lincoln and at 1700 at Kingvale. It was marked by <br />a single, narrow-frontal rainband. Low-level relative <br />humidity increased substantially behind the front. After <br />the band passed through the Sierra Nevada, an oro- <br />graphic cloud remained. This cloud produced minor <br />amounts of precipitation for several hours. <br />Supercooled water was present in the storm <br />throughout its existence: it was greatest (0.70-1.00 mm) <br />in the leading midlevel stratus and least (0.15-0.50 <br />mm) in the frontal band. Supercooled water was 0.20 <br /> <br />to 0.50 mm continuously for 11 h in the postfrontal <br />orographic cloud. Icing rate data from SQP and SIG <br />confirmed that supercooled water was present near the <br />crest from the onset of the cold frontal rainband until <br />dissipation of the orographic cloud. <br />Discussion. The 22 December 1986 storm was one <br />of 12 storms that impacted the Sierra during the dis- <br />sipation stages of weakening cyclones. These storms <br />had many common characteristics. Clouds and pre- <br />cipitation were associated with the passage of weak cold <br />fronts. The storms all moved into a mean long-wave <br />ridge located over the western United States. Split flow <br />at middle and upper levels of the atmosphere was com- <br />mon. The parent occluded-circulation centers asso- <br />ciated with the cold fronts were typically located at 500 <br />latitude or greater and were dissipating. The storms all <br />occurred during extremely dry months, based on an <br />89-year climatology. <br />No significant precipitation fell prior to the passage <br />of the cold front in any storm except on 18 December <br />1986, when light (0.5-1.0 mm h-I) precipitation fell <br />for several hours prior to cold frontal passage. Maxi- <br />mum precipitation rates in all storms (2-6 mm h -I) <br />were associated with the cold frontal passage. After cold <br />frontal passage, orographic clouds typically formed. <br />Embedded convection may have been present within <br />these clouds, but it did not appear to be very important <br />to the precipitation processes, as evidenced by steady <br />precipitation rates (typically <I mm h-1). Typical <br />storm duration, based on measurable precipitation at <br />Kingvale or the presence of supercooled water-bearing <br />clouds, ranged from 12 to 24 hours. <br />Complete radiometer datasets were available for five <br />storms in this group. In all five storms, supercooled <br />water was present in the clouds throughout the lifetime <br />of the storms. The highest values were typically ob- <br />served in the prefrontal midlevel stratus present in three <br />storms. Values there ranged from 0.05 to 0.60 mm, <br />depending on the storm. The duration of values of this <br />magnitude ranged from 3 to 13 h. Supercooled water <br />values generally ranged from 0.10 to 0.40 mm within <br />the frontal bands and postfrontal orographic clouds. <br />The postfrontal period lasted from 6 to 19 h depending <br />on the storm. Small peaks were present in some cases, <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />