My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12864
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSPC12864
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 1:47:11 PM
Creation date
4/15/2008 1:32:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8062
Description
Federal Water Rigjts, National Forest ISF Claims
State
CO
Author
CWCB/Varied
Title
Confidential Attorney Work Product - Master Outline of Trial Preparation Tasks
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />800L <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />bob0414 <br /> <br />CON F IDE N T ~ A L <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />r.j t ~j u RAN lJ U t1 fuCOA--L LJ +'1 cR- R\ t:,..C,f7S <br /> <br />Co ,--0 ~O LI '( t C..,"r7 I OJ'> <br />Y 1'1t()JV't-L fi>e~7 r IS. f:-(c..".,/J,S <br />, ecvt N\ CJT-L $.7 v 0 I 0'3 <br />April 14, 19:::6 ((O,.J~Vl-1 S"eL.t::'L7to..) !-(OWT~ <br /> <br />Reserved Rights - National FOt-est Service Technical Studies: <br />Questions for Interviews for Second Cantt-act <br /> <br />~ t' '.' <br />Ku:n reager <br /> <br />Bob Hykan <br /> <br />FROrf: <br /> <br />Df\TE: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />The maIn purpose tor this second contract is to utILIze the <br />expertise of a second group of consultants in our technical studies. <br />These experts should be sufficiently familiar and comfortable with the <br />work of Simons, Li, & Associates (SLA) that they could defend it in <br />court. At a minimunl1 this contrac:t will cover the followirlQ three tdsks: <br /> <br />1) a written review of all materials submitted to the State by SLA; <br /> <br />2) participation in all foeetings between the State and SLA where key <br />technical decisions may be made; <br /> <br />3) participation 10 the first round 01 field work. <br /> <br />Q!d~~11QQ~ <br /> <br />1. In addition to the three general tasks described above, can you <br />suggest ways in which your participation could facilitate or improve tne <br />tectlnical studies? <br /> <br />2. Have you ever worked with SLA or any of the principals thereof? Do <br />you foresee any problems in our proposed arrangement? <br /> <br />3. What areas of the study to you see as subject to the most <br />controversy? Where would the input of a second opinion be most critical? <br /> <br />4. This second contt.act <br />individuals rather than <br />would be involved? <br /> <br />requires the participation of <br />(necessarily) a team effort. <br /> <br />a fet!J key <br />Who in your <br /> <br />firm <br /> <br />5. Rapid response may often be necessary. <br />any extended committments (in particular, <br />which may intet.fere with a quick response? <br /> <br />Do any of your key people <br />ones that 3re out of state) <br /> <br />n.t~ \/E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.