Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Alternative Methodologies <br /> <br />1. What will be your action if your alternative methodology indicates <br />that more water is needed than requested by the federal government, or if <br />the amount requested is still going to have an impact on existing users? <br /> <br />2. In developing alternative methodologies, is it sufficient to look at <br />the sediment transport balance, or must other factors be taken into <br />consideration? <br /> <br />3 If runoff from thunderstorms can be shown to be significant in terms <br />of channel maintenance, how would this be incorporated into an <br />alternative methodology? What would be the impact on other water rights? <br /> <br />Simons, Li & Associates <br /> <br />3.6c What types of data are available from the Denver Water Board? <br /> <br />3.6d Will all drainages be reviewed for historical conditions, both water <br />use and land use, or will this be limited primarily to gaged basins? <br />Will the water use information be in a form that can later be used for <br />the impact analysis? <br /> <br />3.8 Will there be enough data, esp. on such factors as bed and bank <br />material, to adequately define 10 categories of stream prior to the major <br />field work? Will the categories be reevaluated after the field work is <br />complete? <br /> <br />3.8i How do the three case studies fit in with the rest of the field <br />work? Are they to be on streams with significant diversions? Why three? <br /> <br />KKBNA <br /> <br />p8. You mention research on steep gradient gravel-bed streams in Canada, <br />new Zealand, and the United Kingdom. How do these studies compare with <br />those being done in the United States? <br /> <br />Bishop, Brogden & Rumph, Inc. <br /> <br /> <br />p4. For streams where glacial action and deposition and mass wasting are <br />or were important processes, do you foresee the necessity for a <br />channel-maintenance flow? If so, what functions would it perform, and <br />how might it compare with the one claimed by the U.S.? <br /> <br />p9. Would water generation through timber cutting have any long-term <br />effects on the water required for channel maintenance and on the water <br />available to other users? <br /> <br />pIS. What sort of information will be collected when you visit many of <br />the Forest Service claims? <br />