Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />- <br />I <br /> <br />D. R. = <br /> <br />TS <br />T:NC' <br />...1 <br /> <br />Cs <br />CNs <br /> <br />where: <br /> <br />TS ::: the individual storm precipitation averages for each of <br />the test stations for seeded storms, <br /> <br />TNS ::: the individual storm precipitation averages for each of the <br />test statiolls for non-seeded storms, <br /> <br />'CS ::: an average of the individual storm pr,ocipitation average <br />from each of the eight control stations for the seeded <br />stonns, and <br /> <br />~s ::: an average of the individual storm prc;lCipitation averages <br />from each of the eight control stations for the not-seeded <br />stonns. <br /> <br />This provides a simple way of comparing se(~ed and not seeded pre- <br />cipitation ratios, corrected for the natural intensity of a given stonn <br />as measured by the control area average precipitation. <br /> <br />A plot of these ratios is presented in Figure 4 where it is apparent <br />that the precipitation ratios in and near the control are very close to <br />unity. To the northeast and east of the seeding site these ratios increase <br />to a value of 2:1 centered near Buttonwillow (#16) with a finger of <br />relatively high ratios extending southeast from the primary target area <br />into western Ventura County. To the east of this, in central Kern and <br />Ventura Counties, the ratios appear to drop back: to near unity although <br />very 1i ttle data were available for analysis in these areas. This pattern <br /> <br />4-7 <br />