Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" . <br /> <br /> <br />".. <br /> <br /> <br />4. PROGRAM EVALUATION <br /> <br />Evaluations of the results of a cloud seeding program are unfor- <br />ttmately rather difficult. The seemingly simple problem of detennining <br />the effects of cloud seeding has received considerable attention over <br />the years. The primary reason for the difficulty stems from the large <br />natural variability in the amounts of precipitation that occur in a <br />given area. Since cloud seeding is only feasible when there are clouds <br />and usually only when there are clouds that are near to or are already <br />producing precipitation naturally, the question then becomes "did the <br />seeding increase (or d.ecrease) the precipitation that ,vas observed and <br />if so by how much"? The ability to detect a seeding effect then becomes <br />a function of the size of the seeding increase compared to the natural <br />variability in the precipitation pattern~ Larger seeding effects can be <br />dectected easier and with a smaller number of se:eded cases than are <br />required to detect small increases. <br /> <br />The question has been addressed in research seeding programs in the <br />Uni ted States and elsewhere by employing a technique knOlm as randomiza- <br />tion. With this tedmi.que, an objective method is developed to identify <br />seeclable situations. The decision whether to seed or not seed each <br />situation is made randomly. Usually, half the situations over a period <br />of time are seeded and the remaining half left unseeded. Once an adequate <br />number of cases have been acquired, comparisons can be made between <br />observations of such parameters as precipitation for the seeded and <br />lUlseeded cases. Any apparent differences are tested for significance <br />using various statistical tests to determine whether there is a high <br />probability.that the differences are important. Results from such research <br />programs are available for a variety of programs. <br /> <br />The approach that has been adopted in this evaluation is to utilize <br />the data from the Santa Barbara research project as a base for the develop- <br />ment of a "target" and "control" comparison since the seeding teclmique <br />used in the operational program was essentially the same as the one <br />developed for the research project. <br /> <br /> <br />4-1 <br />