My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00306 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00306 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:03 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 4:23:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Discusison of "Weather Modification in Arizona in 1971" by Herbert A. Osborn
Date
6/1/1972
State
AZ
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Placement of Seeding Material with Respect to the Cloud. - In <br />ARIDROP, the seeding material was placed directly into the buoyant <br />updraft in the core of the clouds. In the Catalina experiment, "the <br />airplane was flown back and forth along a line 15-20 mi long per- <br />pendicular to the wind at flight level and about 30 min upwind from <br />the foothills of the mountains." (Battan, 1966). In Experiment I <br />(1957-1960) the seeding was carried out at the _60 C level (18,000 <br />to 20,000 feet), well above the level at which most convective <br />cloudbases subsequently formed; in Experiment II (1961. 1962, 1964) <br />the seeding was done at altitudes 1.000 to 2.000 feet below cloud- <br />base level but still at the same upwind distance and not. as Neyman, <br />Osborn, et al. (1972) say, "at" or "from the cloud base." The exper- <br />imental design postulated that the seeding material became evenly <br />dispersed through a layer of air 1 kilometer deep centered at the <br />seeding level; how well this postulate was fulfilled is very ques- <br />tionable. It is very likely that many if not most of the clouds or <br />cloud-building updrafts penetrated portions of the layer apart from <br />the smoke plume laid down by the seeding aircraft. while the remainder <br />got much heavier doses than the design called for. <br /> <br />The difference in procedures is crucial, both for the dynaaic and <br />physical processes involved and for the effective persistence of the <br />silver iodide itself. Since seeding into different parts of the <br />cloud is involved, the two-dimensional model of Murray and Anderson <br />(1965), Murray and Koening (1971), furnishes the most appropriate <br />framework. In this model, the dynamic activity is measured by the <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.