Laserfiche WebLink
<br />D R AFT <br /> <br />with other estimates indicate an additional potential of 467,000 acre- <br /> <br />feet outside the Basin and about 298,000 acre-feet in the Lower <br /> <br />;t. <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin (fig. 4). <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The NAWC study estimate is based on application of watershed models, <br />which include evaporation and other losses, and cloud models to <br />individual storm and rawinsonde data for a 20-year (1952-1971) <br /> <br />period. This more recent estimate appears most consistent with <br />current physical analyses and evaluations of seeding experiments and <br />can be considered the best and most conservative runoff augmentation <br /> <br />potential estimate at this time. <br /> <br />The NAWC study estimated the potential by broad mountain ranges which <br /> <br />include the major runoff areas. The principle rivers receiving <br />additional runoff from these ranges are shown in table 2. <br /> <br />Table 2. - Augmentation by mountain ranges <br /> <br /> Reg i on a 1 <br />Mountain range augmentation potential Principle rivers <br />Wind River 231,000 acre-feet Upper Green, Big Horn <br />Uinta 118 , 000 acre-feet Green, Weber, Bear, <br /> Duchesne <br />Park Range 194,000 acre-feet Yampa, North Platte <br />Central Colorado 741,000 acre-feet Colorado, Gunnison, <br /> White, South Platte, <br /> Arkansas <br />San Juan 498,000 acre-feet San Juan, Rio Grande, <br /> Dolores <br />Mogo llon Rim 298,000 acre-feet Little Colorado, Salt <br /> River, Gila <br /> 2,080,000 acre-feet <br /> <br />16 <br />