Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~. T~e scavefiging ar CCN by ice is greater than scavenging <br /> <br /> <br />raindrops. <br /> <br />tvn:.cal <br /> <br />sizes <br /> <br />~"""'r <br />.L v_ <br /> <br />rr\' <br />\....Va' <br /> <br />~""a <br />~L ~ <br /> <br />C.i to 1.0 ;J:n. <br /> <br />This <br /> <br />-~1 <br />size o~ <br /> <br />ra::ge <br /> <br />~s within the Greenfield (1957) gap i~ which i~ertial <br /> <br />impaction <br /> <br />. " -- <br />a~i'5~~w~ia~ c~fi~sion a~e both ~inimam. Within the G~eenfield gap the' <br /> <br />20~1~c~~ scave2gi~g process is by phcretic <br /> <br />forces, <br /> <br />i.e., <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />::::erilicphoret:.c a;:d - d::ffusiophoretic. <br /> <br />Tney arp aiillost always of <br /> <br />---;::. <br /> <br />c~Dosi~e directio~. <br /> <br />For the conditions in the ice cloud (water <br /> <br />sat~re~ion), tje ice crystals are slightly warTIer than tte environment <br /> <br />a:l:::' <br /> <br />her:ce <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />ther~ophoretic force <br /> <br />is <br /> <br />neQct2.ve <br /> <br />while <br /> <br />.... <br />\-ne <br /> <br />d~ffusi8?hcre~ic fo~ce is posi~ive. <br /> <br />Theoretical calcula:ions indicate <br /> <br />~ha: raindrcps i3 a w=ter sat~rated environ~ent (Glover, <br /> <br />et al. <br />-- <br /> <br />1977 ) <br /> <br />a~c ice crys:als (~crtin. et ai. 1980) in a water satura=ed environment <br /> <br />_':I <br />bot~ nave co~lectiG~ e:ficie~cies within the Gree~field gap of ~lO~. <br /> <br />The ~i=fe!"e:lce <br /> <br />"'!r'!! <br />~i.i. <br /> <br />co~centration between ice crysta~s and <br /> <br />raindrops <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />s~gges~s ~here s~culd be fewer cex in an ice C~OUG. Even so, it is not <br /> <br />~Lear ~necner scavengir:g alone would result in fewer C~ above the OOC <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />level. The scave~gi~g ~rocess is extremely complex anc ir. need of more <br /> <br />.; <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />s:.~::'!: . <br /> <br />c. '.i.ae cloud droplets are accreted by the ice crystals. The <br />;:olle~tio!: efEciei:.cy of cloed drcplets b" ice crystals ~s <br />] <br /> <br />co~~e=~ratiaGs ac~oss the O~C level. <br /> <br />Although accretiop. would result <br /> <br />\ <br />I <br />I <br />\ <br />1 <br />I <br />i <br />t <br />i <br />, <br />i <br />! <br /> <br />exponent~ally depe~de~t oa cloud droplet size when t~e drop diameter is <br /> <br />< ~L ~I (?r~?pccher a~G Kle~t, 1980, p. 498). This fact alone does not <br /> <br />r <br />i_ <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />k <br />! - <br />i <br />, <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />aQ~e =8 ex~lai~ tte a??arent distinct cifference i~ clo~d droplet <br /> <br />yerticcl g~c~~ent, <br /> <br />~t wo~ld not resul~ in a <br /> <br />distinct <br /> <br />22 <br />