Laserfiche WebLink
<br />;>r <br /> <br />;;I <br /> <br />nated by Koenig (1959) and modified in the EG&G laboratory was used to <br />identify AgI particles which had behaved as ice nuclei in collected snow <br />samples. However, this technique required skillful, tedious, and expen- <br />sive operations, which were not practical for large scale field experiments. <br /> <br />Consequently, a more simple, inexpensive method was developed in the <br />EG&G laboratory. and at about the same time by Knight (1969), and used <br />during the 1968-69 season with good results. This new technique was based <br />on the simple principle that any submicron size particle can act as a seed <br />in its own supersaturated solution and can thus grow to any desired size. <br /> <br />Using this principle, snow crystal replica slides collected in the Park Range <br />Project Area were partially immersed in a supersaturated AgI-KI aqueous <br />solution for 2 to 3 hours, and then allowed to dry. Crystal photographs <br />taken prior to immersion and drying were compared to photographs taken <br />after treatment, and the percentage of individual crystal replicas which grew <br />microscopically visible AgI crystals at the replica centers was computed. <br />Examples of the visual appearance of crystal replicas with AgI centers are <br />shown in Figures 9 and 10. Evidence of AgI scavenged on dendrite arms is <br />visible in Figure 11. <br /> <br />2. 8 Silver Content of Snow Water <br /> <br />;t: <br /> <br />An atomic absorption spectrophotometer has been used to analyze collected <br />snow samples for the past two seasons. The methodology is described in <br />detail by Parungo and Robertson (1969). Analysis for silver concentration <br />in precipitation was performed by this technique using ~ 1000 snow samples <br />from the 1967-68 operational season and 321 samples from the 1968-69 <br />season. <br /> <br />Initially, snow samples were taken from snow boards and through the snow- <br />pack after periods on the order of a week. Though some success was <br />achieved, the primary fact learned was that it was rr.ore fruitful to add time <br />resolution by taking individual shorter time period samples through a pre- <br />cipitation period, rather than taking one sample at the end of a long precipi- <br />tation period. This proved more fruitful for two reasons: <br /> <br />(1) If the release time is short compared to the total precipitation <br />duration, the sample is likely to be diluted below the practical threshold of <br />analysis. <br /> <br />(2) Transport and dispersion characteristics change over a short <br />time period so that the desired, or significant, results during a short time <br />period may be diluted or masked by negative or indeterminate results during <br />some other time period. <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />23 <br />