My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00295
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00295
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:34:07 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 3:44:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Guidelines for Cloud Seeding to Augment Precipitation
Date
1/1/1995
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />30 <br /> <br />CLOUD SEEDING <br /> <br />2.3.4 Case Study-Environmental Impact Statement <br />for a Prototype Project <br /> <br />The Lake Oroville Runoff Enhancement Program was a 5-year proto- <br />type project under way in the Feather River drainage of California's Sierra <br />Nevada. It was designed to augment snowpack by cloud seeding from <br />ground-based generators with liquid propane as the seeding agent. A <br />comprehensive joint Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental <br />Impact Report (EIS/ EIR) was completed in September 1990 by the Plu- <br />mas National Forest and the California Department of Water Resources <br />(CDWR), the lead public agencies responsible for the proposed project <br />(USDA Forest Service and CDWR 1990, USDA 1991). The document was <br />written to allow tiering to similar projects (should they be proposed). A <br />wide range of potential environmental issues was assessed. These in- <br />cluded water resources (e.g., rain-snow level, length of winter, snowpack, <br />extent of delayed snowmelt, ground water, avalanches, runoff and floods, <br />water use, and downwind precipitation depletion), erosion, water quality, <br />plant communities, rare plants, wildlife, fish and aquatic life, endangered <br />and threatened animals, cultural resources, aesthetic values, transporta- <br />tion, and safety (e.g., floods and avalanches, hazardous material spills, <br />and fire hazard). Within these relatively broad categories, a wide variety <br />of specific subissues were identified, such as those associated with the <br />installation and use of the propane ice-nucleating generators. <br />Some results from the joint EIS/EIR elucidate the extent of the investi- <br />gation: <br /> <br />. Installation of temporary facilities (the propane generators) on land <br />allocated to semiprimitive management by the Forest Service will be <br />removed in summer, painted white to reduce aesthetic impact, and <br />located away from the hiking trails. . <br />. Land-disturbing activities (re: the propane dispensers and precipita- <br />tion gauges) can be minimized by the careful replacement of the <br />disturbed soil as near to original conditions as possible to reduce the <br />possibility for increased erosion. <br />. Changes in the amount and intensity of the snowpack and rainfall <br />are expected to be well within natural variations. <br />. The contribution of noncombustive propane seeding to the "green- <br />house effect" is negligible in the anticipated seeding environment. <br />. A delay in snowmelt of 0 to 3 days is estimated. <br />. The propane seeding of cold winter storms will not have a depletable <br />effect on precipitation downwind of the seeding area. <br />. There should be no measurable direct effect on erosion from an <br />augmented snowpack within the project area. <br />. Plant species with extremely limited habitats, including narrow tol- <br />erance to soil moisture regimes, may be affected. Since precipitation <br />would not be altered from the normal range, sensitive plant popula- <br />tions within the project area are not expected to change. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.