My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00295
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00295
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:34:07 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 3:44:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Guidelines for Cloud Seeding to Augment Precipitation
Date
1/1/1995
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />16 <br /> <br />CLOUD SEEDING <br /> <br />mostly to increase soil moisture and ground water flows (Changnon et al. <br />1988; Knapp et al. 1988). <br />In a related unique field experiment in Illinois, the actual effects of <br />enhanced rain on crop production were evaluated. Large (9 m X 48 m) <br />mobile, plastic-covered shelters with sprinkler systems are being used to <br />exclude natural rain but otherwise expose crop plots to the prevailing <br />weather. Watering is quantified and timed to the historical rain-day pre- <br />cipitation records for wet, dry, and average summers, and water is added <br />to simulate modification. Initial results indicated that rainfall increases of <br />10-40% in Illinois increase com and soybean yields by 4-20% if natural <br />rainfall is below or near average (Changnon and Hollinger 1988). Refined <br />results showed that, for 2.5 em of rainfall added during a hot, dry sum- <br />mer, yields increased "10 bu/ acre for com and 4 bu/ acre for soybeans." <br />In a summer of average rain, increases are less, about "5 bu/ acre for corn <br />and 3 bu/ acre for soybeans." Yields of both crops were shown to decrease <br />when summer rainfall exceeds 36 em. Rain increases of realistic percent- <br />ages applied with the sprinklers only on days when natural rainfall was <br />less than 0.25 em provided no detectable yield increases, whereas a 40% <br />rain increase on all rain days produced the greatest increase in crop yield. <br />Com yields responded well to added rain on days with 0.25-2.5 em of <br />natural rainfall (Changnon and Hollinger 1990). <br />Yield trends and stability influence both micro economic (e.g., single <br />farm) and macroeconomic (e.g., aggregate Com Belt) decision makers as <br />they set priorities for investment in new technologies, such as cloud <br />seeding (Garcia et al. 1987). It is not feasible for a single producer to have <br />a cloud seeding program, but groups of producers might do so. Thus, it <br />is appropriate to consider local and regional impacts (Dennis 1980), Le., <br />the level of aggregation in effort, area seeded, and economic effect. <br />As yields have steadily increased with improving agricultural technol- <br />ogy other than cloud seeding, variability of yields and the absolute yield <br />risk to producers have also increased. These increases in variability and <br />risk could be due to a heightened sensitivity of technology to weather, or <br />to temporal increases in weather variability. These findings have implica- <br />tions for estimating the economic effects of a fluctuating climate and soci- <br />ety's response to mitigate adverse effects. Enhanced precipitation and <br />consequent moderated crop heat stress might reduce risk by alleviating <br />extreme year-to-year yield changes. However, yields are influenced by a <br />broad set of agriclimatic conditions that must be considered in estimating <br />the overall impact of weather. Therefore, differences in estimated weather <br />effects on yields for similar aggregation levels must be accounted for. Lack <br />of sensitivity to these differences can result in inappropriate measurement <br />of the distribution of economic gains from activities such as cloud seeding. <br />The effects of seeding are likely to be regionalized, and this can distort its <br />relative attractiveness to user groups representing differing spatial aggre- <br />gations such as a few farms, a few counties, or a state (Garcia et al. 1987). <br />To aid in policy making, an effort was made to determine the economic <br />beneficiaries of a functioning precipitation modification technology <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.