<br />JUNE 1983
<br />
<br />LIN, FARLEY AND ORVILLE
<br />
<br />1067
<br />
<br />b. The properties of hail ,
<br />
<br />. In clouds with sufficiently strong updrafts, the rim-
<br />mg of snow crystals, snowflakes and graupel particles
<br />may continue until hailstones are produced. Accord-
<br />ing to the Glossary of Met~orology, hail is "precipi-
<br />tation in the form of balls 6r irregular lumps of ice."
<br />An individual unit of hail is called a hailstone which
<br />by convention, has a diameter of 5 mm or more:
<br />Smaller ice particles of similar character are called
<br />graupel, ice pellets or frozen rain. In this study we
<br />I '
<br />shall use the term hail rather loosely to represent high-
<br />density graupe1, ice pellets, frozen rain and hailstones.
<br />The bulk density of hailstones tends to vary radially
<br />from surface to core, with ~lternating concentric lay-
<br />ers of lower and higher defl.sity. The density of such
<br />hailstone shells has been (ound to vary usually be-
<br />tween 0.8 and 0.9 g cm-3 (Pruppacher and Klett,
<br />1978). The terminal veloc;ities of hailstones range
<br />from about 10 to 40 m S-l pr more. Auer (1972) has
<br />summarized measurements on the size distribution
<br />of hailstones and graupel paIticles. The concentration
<br />for graupel particles with diameters between 0.5 and
<br />5 mm rang~ between 103 a~d 1 m-3, while large hail-
<br />stones of dIameters between 2.5 and 8 cm range in
<br />concentration from 10-6 to: 10-2 m-3. Auer proposed
<br />an inverse power law to describe the hail size distri-
<br />butions while others, such as Douglas (1960) and
<br />Federer and Waldvogel (19~5), have proposed inverse
<br />exponential distributions.
<br />Pre~ent studies indicate ,hat hailstones may origi-
<br />nat~ eIther as graupel or frozen drops (Knight and
<br />Kmght, 1979). For warrn-pased clouds with cloud
<br />base temperature 150C or : higher, the frozen drops
<br />predominate in the formation of hailstones while for
<br />cold-based clouds with cloud base temper~ture 50C
<br />or lower, hailstones usually originate as graupel par-
<br />!icles. List (1960) and Knight and Knight (1979)
<br />Identified graupel particles as embryos for about 80%
<br />of the sampled hailstones which fell in Switzerland
<br />and Colorado, where the vast majority of cloud base
<br />temperatures are lOoC or colder. The graupel em-
<br />bryos, in turn, may have originated as snow crystals
<br />or on small frozen drops. "Iherefore, snow is an im-
<br />portant factor in hailstorms, especially for continen-
<br />tal, cold-based clouds. Recent in situ observations
<br />support this point of view (Dye et al., 1974; Gagin
<br />1971 )', '
<br />
<br />3. The cloud model
<br />
<br />'a. General description
<br />
<br />This model is mainly ba~ed on Chang (1977) and
<br />Orville and Kopp (1977). It is a two-dimensional
<br />time-dependent cloud model with bulk water micro~
<br />physics. The domain of the model is 19.2 km in both
<br />the X and Z dimensions with a 200 m grid interval.
<br />The model contains five classes of hydrometeors:
<br />,
<br />
<br />l .
<br />,t., .. \ .1
<br />iIi~'J:..,i;..~";i'i.i.:J.""".,,,,,,,,,J,~~,,,.. .,
<br />
<br />";,h..;", ;_\V':<>~~w;i;~:;:., ~ '", -~I, ~~<
<br />
<br />cloud water, cloud ice, rain, snow and hail. Inclusion
<br />of the snow content field allows for an intermediate
<br />and distinct entity between the two forms of ice pre-
<br />viously modeled, namely, the non-precipitating cloud
<br />ice field and the hail veld, resulting in a more phys-
<br />ically sound representation of ice in general and, in
<br />particular, in the production of hail. Previous versions
<br />of the model (e.g., Orville and Kopp, 1977) generated
<br />precipitating ice (hail) via either raindrop freezing or
<br />through a crude representation of the Bergeron pro-
<br />cess. The new treatment allows for more realistic hail
<br />generation mechanisms via the ice phase since the
<br />Bergeron process now produces snow which must
<br />undergo further growth before transforming to hail.
<br />In addition to the Bergeron process, snow may also
<br />be generated by contact freezing and aggregation of
<br />cloud ice. Hail may be produced by a variety of con-
<br />tact freezing mechanisms and via aggregation of
<br />snow. For the model warrri-based clouds, the prob-
<br />ability based freezing ofraindrops (Bigg, 1953) is no
<br />longer the primary mechanism for producing hail
<br />embryos, since raindrop capture of cloud ice or snow
<br />can now be major hail generation mechanisms.
<br />The microphysical equations for snow, as sum- .
<br />marized below, generally follow the development of
<br />Chang (1977), although the two-dimensional, time-
<br />dependent (2DTD) version presented here differs
<br />from Chang's original treatment in some respects.
<br />The terminal velocity of rain now includes height
<br />dependency, and different values of parameters for
<br />the terminal velocity and density of snow are used.
<br />Chang's treatment did not include a Bergeron pro-
<br />cess, while previous versions of the 2DTD cloud
<br />model have simulated this process (e.g., Orville and
<br />Kopp, 1977). The 2DTD snow model includes the
<br />Bergeron process, but as a generation mechanism for
<br />snow instead of hail as originally developed. The ap-
<br />proximation to the Bergeron process was also mod-
<br />ified to conform to the more realistic scheme deVel-
<br />oped by Hsie et al. (1980), who also developed a
<br />modified form of the scheme to allow for coexistence
<br />of cloud water and cloud ice in the temperature region
<br />of -40 to ooc. This scheme allows cloud ice to grow
<br />via deposition at the expense of cloud water which
<br />evaporates to water vapor (Bergeron process).
<br />
<br />b. Cloud microphysics
<br />
<br />The model contains five classes of hydrometeors,
<br />all treated in a highly parameterized fashion. The
<br />cloud water and cloud ice particles are assumed to
<br />be small enough that their terminal velocities can be
<br />neglected co~pared with the velocity of air, rain,
<br />snow and had. The rain, snow and hail possess ap-
<br />preciable terminal velocities. The microphysical pro-
<br />cesses simulated in the model are demonstrated in
<br />Fig. 1 and explained in Table 1.
<br />
|