Laserfiche WebLink
<br />JUNE 1983 <br /> <br />LIN, FARLEY AND ORVILLE <br /> <br />1067 <br /> <br />b. The properties of hail , <br /> <br />. In clouds with sufficiently strong updrafts, the rim- <br />mg of snow crystals, snowflakes and graupel particles <br />may continue until hailstones are produced. Accord- <br />ing to the Glossary of Met~orology, hail is "precipi- <br />tation in the form of balls 6r irregular lumps of ice." <br />An individual unit of hail is called a hailstone which <br />by convention, has a diameter of 5 mm or more: <br />Smaller ice particles of similar character are called <br />graupel, ice pellets or frozen rain. In this study we <br />I ' <br />shall use the term hail rather loosely to represent high- <br />density graupe1, ice pellets, frozen rain and hailstones. <br />The bulk density of hailstones tends to vary radially <br />from surface to core, with ~lternating concentric lay- <br />ers of lower and higher defl.sity. The density of such <br />hailstone shells has been (ound to vary usually be- <br />tween 0.8 and 0.9 g cm-3 (Pruppacher and Klett, <br />1978). The terminal veloc;ities of hailstones range <br />from about 10 to 40 m S-l pr more. Auer (1972) has <br />summarized measurements on the size distribution <br />of hailstones and graupel paIticles. The concentration <br />for graupel particles with diameters between 0.5 and <br />5 mm rang~ between 103 a~d 1 m-3, while large hail- <br />stones of dIameters between 2.5 and 8 cm range in <br />concentration from 10-6 to: 10-2 m-3. Auer proposed <br />an inverse power law to describe the hail size distri- <br />butions while others, such as Douglas (1960) and <br />Federer and Waldvogel (19~5), have proposed inverse <br />exponential distributions. <br />Pre~ent studies indicate ,hat hailstones may origi- <br />nat~ eIther as graupel or frozen drops (Knight and <br />Kmght, 1979). For warrn-pased clouds with cloud <br />base temperature 150C or : higher, the frozen drops <br />predominate in the formation of hailstones while for <br />cold-based clouds with cloud base temper~ture 50C <br />or lower, hailstones usually originate as graupel par- <br />!icles. List (1960) and Knight and Knight (1979) <br />Identified graupel particles as embryos for about 80% <br />of the sampled hailstones which fell in Switzerland <br />and Colorado, where the vast majority of cloud base <br />temperatures are lOoC or colder. The graupel em- <br />bryos, in turn, may have originated as snow crystals <br />or on small frozen drops. "Iherefore, snow is an im- <br />portant factor in hailstorms, especially for continen- <br />tal, cold-based clouds. Recent in situ observations <br />support this point of view (Dye et al., 1974; Gagin <br />1971 )', ' <br /> <br />3. The cloud model <br /> <br />'a. General description <br /> <br />This model is mainly ba~ed on Chang (1977) and <br />Orville and Kopp (1977). It is a two-dimensional <br />time-dependent cloud model with bulk water micro~ <br />physics. The domain of the model is 19.2 km in both <br />the X and Z dimensions with a 200 m grid interval. <br />The model contains five classes of hydrometeors: <br />, <br /> <br />l . <br />,t., .. \ .1 <br />iIi~'J:..,i;..~";i'i.i.:J.""".,,,,,,,,,J,~~,,,.. ., <br /> <br />";,h..;", ;_\V':<>~~w;i;~:;:., ~ '", -~I, ~~< <br /> <br />cloud water, cloud ice, rain, snow and hail. Inclusion <br />of the snow content field allows for an intermediate <br />and distinct entity between the two forms of ice pre- <br />viously modeled, namely, the non-precipitating cloud <br />ice field and the hail veld, resulting in a more phys- <br />ically sound representation of ice in general and, in <br />particular, in the production of hail. Previous versions <br />of the model (e.g., Orville and Kopp, 1977) generated <br />precipitating ice (hail) via either raindrop freezing or <br />through a crude representation of the Bergeron pro- <br />cess. The new treatment allows for more realistic hail <br />generation mechanisms via the ice phase since the <br />Bergeron process now produces snow which must <br />undergo further growth before transforming to hail. <br />In addition to the Bergeron process, snow may also <br />be generated by contact freezing and aggregation of <br />cloud ice. Hail may be produced by a variety of con- <br />tact freezing mechanisms and via aggregation of <br />snow. For the model warrri-based clouds, the prob- <br />ability based freezing ofraindrops (Bigg, 1953) is no <br />longer the primary mechanism for producing hail <br />embryos, since raindrop capture of cloud ice or snow <br />can now be major hail generation mechanisms. <br />The microphysical equations for snow, as sum- . <br />marized below, generally follow the development of <br />Chang (1977), although the two-dimensional, time- <br />dependent (2DTD) version presented here differs <br />from Chang's original treatment in some respects. <br />The terminal velocity of rain now includes height <br />dependency, and different values of parameters for <br />the terminal velocity and density of snow are used. <br />Chang's treatment did not include a Bergeron pro- <br />cess, while previous versions of the 2DTD cloud <br />model have simulated this process (e.g., Orville and <br />Kopp, 1977). The 2DTD snow model includes the <br />Bergeron process, but as a generation mechanism for <br />snow instead of hail as originally developed. The ap- <br />proximation to the Bergeron process was also mod- <br />ified to conform to the more realistic scheme deVel- <br />oped by Hsie et al. (1980), who also developed a <br />modified form of the scheme to allow for coexistence <br />of cloud water and cloud ice in the temperature region <br />of -40 to ooc. This scheme allows cloud ice to grow <br />via deposition at the expense of cloud water which <br />evaporates to water vapor (Bergeron process). <br /> <br />b. Cloud microphysics <br /> <br />The model contains five classes of hydrometeors, <br />all treated in a highly parameterized fashion. The <br />cloud water and cloud ice particles are assumed to <br />be small enough that their terminal velocities can be <br />neglected co~pared with the velocity of air, rain, <br />snow and had. The rain, snow and hail possess ap- <br />preciable terminal velocities. The microphysical pro- <br />cesses simulated in the model are demonstrated in <br />Fig. 1 and explained in Table 1. <br />