Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1074 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF CLIMATE AND APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 22 <br /> <br /> <br />\ <br />\ <br />0.8 \ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />"- <br />" <br />"- <br />...... <br />...... <br />...... <br />x ...... <br />o xX xxoooooooo ....____ <br />XXxx 00 --- <br />x x Xx Xx <br /> <br />= OBSERVATION <br /> <br />~ 0.7 <br />z <br />w <br />Q 06 <br />ll.. <br />ll.. <br />W <br />z Q5 <br />o <br />~ 04 <br />w <br />..J <br />603 <br />u <br /> <br />0.2 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />0.1 <br /> <br /> <br />00 <br /> <br />FIG. 4. Collection efficiencies assumed in the model compared <br />with laboratory observations. The symbol X is for 127 I'm spheres <br />collecting 8-18 I'm crystals. The symbol 0 is for 360 I'm spheres <br />collecting 8-18 I'm crystals (Hosler and Hallgren, 1961). <br /> <br />about 4.5 X 10-11 g g-I S-I to 6.9 X 10-10 g g-I S-I, <br />when Icw is in the range of 10-4 to IO-z g g-I, PSFI <br />ranges from 8.8 X 10-10 to 3.2 X 10-9 g g-I S-I, with <br />ICI in the range of 5 X 10-8 to 10-4 g g-I. <br />In the production rates PSAC1 [(22)] and PGACS <br />[(29)], we used assumed collection efficienciesEsI and <br />EGs, given respectively by (23) and (30). A similar <br />temperature dependence has been assumed for the <br />rate coefficients for. PSAUT [(21)] and PGAUT [(37)]. <br />Unfortunately, there have been few experimental <br />studies of ice collecting ice and no theoretical studies <br />due to the complexity of the problem. Fig. 4 compares <br />the assumed collection efficiencies to the values de- <br />rived from laboratory studies as reported by" Hosler <br />and Hallgren (1961). The obvious disa.greement be- <br />tween the assumed and observed collection efficien- <br />cies is due to the fact that the observed values were <br />obtained at ice saturation. In a related study, Hosler <br />et al. (1957) note considerably higher efficiencies at <br />ice supersaturation, the efficiency increasing with in- <br />creasing temperature. In a somewhat different vein, <br />Passarelli (1978) deduced a mean aggregation effi- <br />ciency of 1.4 :t 0.6 from aircraft data. He noted ef- <br />ficient aggregation extended down to the -12 to <br />- 15 oC range and attributed the difference between <br />his findings and laboratory studies to the fact that <br />nature produces more elaborate crystals and larger <br />sizes. The assumed collection efficiencies reflect the <br />results quoted above in a number of ways: <br /> <br />(ii) Efficiencies are highest at OOC, consistent with <br />the indirect evidence of efficient aggregation in this <br />region provided by the radar "bright band." <br />(iii) The trend to higher than observed values in <br />the intermediate temperature range seems justified <br />due to the likelihood of ice supersaturation in this <br />regime. <br />(iv) ESI is greater than,EGs consistent with the rel- <br />ative ease with which ice crystals are collected by <br />snow crystals as opposed to hard ice spheres as in- <br />dicated by Nakaya (1954). <br /> <br />/. <br /> <br />. d. Production term for hail <br /> <br />Both dry and wet growth of hail are considered in <br />this model, while only dry growth is considered in <br />Chang (1977). <br />The total production term for hail can be written <br />as: <br /> <br />(i) If the temperature is below OOC (T < To): <br />PG = PGAUT + PGFR + PGDRy (or PGWET) <br />+ PSACR( 1 - (h) + PRACS( 1 - oz) + PRAC1 <br />X (1 - (3) + P1ACR(1 - (3) + PGSUB(1 - (1)' (35) <br />(ii) If the temperature is above OOC (T ~ To): <br /> <br />PG = PGMLT + PGACS' <br /> <br />(36) <br /> <br />The definition of 01, Oz and 03 are given by (20). <br />The two sets of coupled terms present in (35) [PRACt. <br />P1ACR and PRACS, PSACR], are given earlier by (25), <br />(26) and (27), (28). For PRAC1 arid P1ACR, hail will be <br />produced only when the mixing ratio of rain (/R) ex- <br />ceeds 10-4 gg-I. For PSACR and PRACS, hail production <br />results when the mixing ratio of either rain or snow <br />exceeds 10-4 g g-I. <br /> <br />1) SNOW CRYSTAL AGGREGATION, <br /> <br />Rimed snow crystals may collide and aggregate to <br />form graupel or hail. The aggregation rate is assumed <br />to follow the form used to express the aggregation of <br />cloud ice to form snow [Eq. (21)]. The aggregation <br />rate may be expressed as <br /> <br />PGAUT = uz(/s - Iso), (37) <br /> <br />where Uz is a rate coefficient (s-'), and Iso is a mass <br />threshold for snow; Iso is set somewhat arbitrarily at <br />6 X 10-4 g g-I as in Chang (1977). The rate coefficient <br />Uz is assumed to be temperature dependent and is <br />given as <br />Uz = 10-3 exp[0.09(T - To)]. (38) <br /> <br />(i) The assumed efficiencies, especially EGs, are Note that the temperature dependence of the rate <br />close to the observations at low temperatures where coefficient is the same as that used for the collection <br />ice saturation is more likely. efficiency of hail for snow [(30)]. <br />