My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00285 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00285 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:32:46 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 3:39:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Feasibility Study of Wintertime Cloud Seeding to Augment Arizona Water Supplies
Date
1/1/1987
State
AZ
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3. Weather Modification Techniques <br /> <br />3.1 Ba ck g rou nd <br /> <br />Research in cloud physics and precipitation formation processes for <br />nearly a half-century eventually 1 ed to pralcti cal methods of cloud modi- <br />fication (e.g. Schaefer, 1951; Mason, 1975) in the 1940's. Research by <br />Bernard Vonnegut (1947) for substances whose crystalline structure <br />resembles ice led to the discovery of AgI (silver iodide) as an artifi- <br />cial ice nucleant. His work yielded procedures that enabled the produc- <br />tion of up to 1016 particles per gram of AgI. Some of the nuclei led to <br />ice crystal formation at temperatures as warm as -5 oC. Si nce the cost <br />of seeding was so inexpensive with operation of ground-based nuclei <br />generating equipment only $2 to $3 per hou'r and aircraft operation only <br />about $25 per hour, by 1950 nearly 10 percent of the United States was <br />to receive cloud seeding (Dennis, 1980). Due to beneficiary dissatis- <br />faction with operational project results and few experiments suggesting <br />a positive treatment effect (Farhar, 1978), controversy developed <br />regarding the efficacy of cloud seeding. <br /> <br />Scientists soon recognized that a better understanding of cloud preci- <br />pitation processes was necessary to obtain predictable results. <br />Consequently, there have been a number of efforts aimed at increasing <br />such knowledge (e.g., Mielke et al., 1971; Grant and Elliott, 1974) but <br />only in the past 10 years has the instrumentation emerged and the <br />knowledge of scientists grown adequate, to develop more sophisticated <br />and detailed conceptual models of orographic clouds likely to have <br />potential for augmentation, and to develop more detailed cloud treatment <br />and seeding agent delivery models (Grant clnd Rauber, 1985). <br /> <br />3.2 Winter cloud types with modification potential <br /> <br />Currently, the cloud types considered to possess potential for preclpl- <br />tation augmentation are the shallow orographic cloud (figure 1), the <br />embedded convective cloud and the isolated convective cloud. The <br />o rographi c cloud, best known of the three types, is formed by the <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.