Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br /> <br />study is confirmed by field observations, there is moderate potential for <br />precipitation augmentation on the Mogollon Rim. <br /> <br />A survey of previous modeling studies, two performed specifically for the <br />Mogollon Rim, and prior winter experiments of relevance to Arizona also <br />indicated moderate potential for precipitation and streamflow enhancement <br />by wintertime cloud seeding over the Mogollon Rim. When the hydrologic <br />model, CAPSIM (Central Arizona Project Simulation Model), was applied <br />employing a range of demands with three realistic enhancement scenarios, <br />the increases in yield to AMWUA (Arizona ~1unicip~1 W,at'er Users Association) <br />. " <br /> <br />varied from 11.1 to 23.6 percent. The three,enhancement scenarios con- <br />sisted of percentage increases obtained from a study. of Arizona conditions <br />by Beddome ~~. (1983), and 10 and 15 pl:rcent increases. Other results <br />from CAPSIM indicated that optimization of the SRP (Salt River Project) <br />demand, in conjunction with proper storag1e schemes, could additionally <br />enhance yields from cloud seeding. Analyses indicated that the CAP <br />(Central Arizona Project) canal has the capacity to transport additional <br />water to the Pinal and Tucson AMA1s (Active Management Area). <br />Consequently, exchange agreements could be executed that would enable those <br />areas to benefit from additional water supplies from cloud treatment. <br /> <br />A brief environmental study was performed to determine the broad environ- <br />mental resources and potential effects of cloud seeding in the Mogollon <br />Rim. In general, data collection and cloud seeding demonstration programs <br />were not identified as creating significant impacts on environmental <br />resources. Before seeding activities are begun, however, an EA <br />(environmental assessment) covering all environmental categories must be <br />prepared to address important environmental features. If no significant <br />effects are anticipated, a FONSI (Finding of No Significant Impact) will be <br />made. If it is determined that significant effects are possible, an EIS <br />(Environmental Impact Statement) will be required by the NEPA (National <br />Environmental Policy Act). <br /> <br />The EA should be prepared in consultation with appropriate Federal and <br />State agencies as well as the general public, the entire process taking <br />about 9 months for completion. The EIS, if necessary, will take 18 months <br /> <br />B <br />