My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00283 (3)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00283 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:32:32 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 3:39:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Application of the Colorado River Simulation System in Evaluation of Weather Modification Activity
Prepared By
Edward M. Novak
Date
7/1/1980
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />In the Lower Basin, each demand generally represents a particular user, such <br />as the MWD (Metropolitan Water District), CAP (Central Arizona Project), <br />etc. <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />The CRSS node di agram or network, fi gure 3, was used to interface the incre- <br />ment increase from weather modification with historic generated inputted <br />flows. Yearly natural flows and total dissolved solids at Lees Ferry arE~ <br />depicted in table 1. Table 2 represents stations on the network which are <br />input points and correspond to those areas affected by incremental increiises <br />from weather modification depicted on figure 1. These specific stations were <br />adjusted for precipitation enhancement (table 3). Regression analysis <br />techniques were used to provide values in table 3. Flow intercept and slope <br />were determined from comparison of 1952-1971 virgin flow at a particular <br />station with incremental flow at that station as listed in the Twelve Basin <br />Investigation 6/. The salt loading coefficient was determined in a similar <br />manner by comparing the 1952-1971 virgin flow with salinity values set up in <br />the CRSS model. The mean flow multiplied by 140 percent at each station was <br />utilized for establishing suspension criteria. The data were arranged by <br />water year in the computer program. The majority of the runoff for a water <br />year occurs in the May-August period of each year. <br /> <br />Virgin flow values for the input points shown in figure 3 were compared to <br />precipitation enhancement increases as listed in the Twelve Basin Investiga- <br />tion 6/. The 1952-1971 historical period was used in this analysis because <br />this was the span of years covered by the Twelve Basin Investigation in <br />establishing precipitation increases due to weather modification. <br /> <br />Suspension criteria for the study was developed by using the specific limits <br />stipulated for the Colorado River Basin Pilot Project 8/ and those proposed <br />for the Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project 9/. These suspension period values <br />were tested against historical snow course data, and a single critedon of <br />1.4 times the 1952-1971 mean was used. <br /> <br />The results of the CRSS runs provide a realistic analysis of operational <br />weather modification activity in the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1991 to <br />2020. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />I <br />-~- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.