Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The model utilizes thresholds for a number of <br />other parameters such as average relative humidity for <br />key layers that indicate whether a sounding is "dry" or <br />"wet" and thus whether a full computation should be <br />performed. Some analysis on the sensitivity of these <br />parameters has been performed to improve model <br />capability, but additional work is needed. <br /> <br />4. ~ESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Sounding data from MM4 runs were available <br />for January 1979. Consequently, results included <br />herein of model applications are for this time period <br />only, for both geographical areas studied. Matthews <br />et al. (these proceedings) discusses meteorological <br />features of the MM4-produced soundings. <br /> <br />Precipitation data to be used for model <br />verification and improvement were obtained for <br />24 gauges in or near the Delaware River watershed <br />and 11 gauges on the Mogollon Rim. Daily mean <br />values were developed for each of the two groups of <br />gauges. The model was configured to estimate daily <br />mean values for two groups of points (in the model <br />domains) that correspond to the gauge locations. <br /> <br />Figures 4 through 6 respectively show <br />contoured results (51 by 48 grid points for the <br />Delaware and 45 by 35 grid points for Arizona) of <br />model-estimated monthly sums for January 1979 for <br />the Mogollon Rim with DRA, INW, and TUS <br />sounding data as input to the model; Mogollon Rim <br />with MM4-generated sounding data as input; and the <br />Delaware River watershed with PIT sounding data. <br /> <br />l'I?'"U~""aD~n.~a.nuu"~u <br />II <br />d <br />4? <br />66 <br />" <br />41 <br />U <br />37 <br />:16 <br />:16 <br />II <br />l!ll <br />lI'7 <br />Zll <br />Zll <br />21 <br />I' <br />L' <br />~ <br />11 <br />11 <br />. <br />? <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />L . I ? <br /> <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />Fig. 4, Model-produced Arizona precipitation for <br />January 1979 with DRA, INW, and TUS soundings as <br />model input (contours in inches). <br /> <br />1"?'IIU~""aD~n.ua.nUU"~4? <br />II II <br /> <br /> <br />41 <br />U <br />37 <br />:sa <br />:lS <br />II <br />. <br />lI'7 <br />26;- <br />Zll <br />21 <br />" <br />" <br />~ <br />u <br /> <br />Fig. 5. Model-produced Arizona precipitation for <br />29 days of January 1979 with MM4-produced <br />soundings as model input (contours in inches). <br /> <br /> <br />11 13 15 17 1921 2J 25 'Zl 29 31 <br /> <br />...3 <br />...1 <br />J9 <br />J7 <br />J6 <br />33 <br />31 <br />29 <br />27 <br />25 <br />2J <br />21 <br />19 '9 <br />17 17 <br />15 15 <br />13 13 <br />11 11 <br />9 9 <br />7 7 <br />5 5 <br />3 3 <br />1 <br />1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 2J 25 27 29 31 33 :E <br /> <br />Fig. 6. Model-produced Delaware River watershed <br />precipitation for January 1979 with PIT soundings as <br />model input (contours in inches). <br /> <br />The orographic nature of the model-produced <br />precipitation on the Mogollon Rim (Figs. 4 and 5) is <br />clearly evident with the highest terrain obtaining the <br />greater amounts of precipitation. Comparing results in <br />Figures 4 and 5 suggests the main effect of MM4- <br />produced soundings is a general increase in the <br />precipitation amount. <br />