My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00277
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00277
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:32:23 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 3:38:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Contract/Permit #
14-06-D-6467
Title
An Operational Adaptation Program for the Colorado River Basin
Prepared By
Lewis O. Grant, Chappell, Crow, Mielke Jr., Rasmussen, Shobe, Stockwell, Wykstra
Date
10/1/1969
State
CO
Country
United States
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />barrier accounts for 60.5% of the total <br />snowfall. <br /> <br />The orographic influence on snowfall <br />at Wolf Creek Summit is also strongly reflected <br />by the 700 mb wind speed. This is shown in <br />Figure 44. The distributions were computed <br />using 4 mps class intervals. It is readily <br />apparent from the distributions of snowfall <br />frequency and amounts that much more snow is <br /> <br />f1i <br />~8 <br />~ <br />..J .6 <br />..J <br />ti! <br />~4 <br />! ,2~ <br />~J <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br /> <br />w <br />~ <br />~ 15 <br />W <br />'-' <br />a: <br />~ 10 <br />W <br />2 <br />>- <br />j 5 <br />w <br />a: <br /> <br />(b) <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />:-'-PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SOOWFALL <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />: FREOUEN::Y OF OCCURRENCE <br /> <br />en <br />I <br />r---1 <br />l l <br /> <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />'l3o <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />170 <br /> <br />210 250 290 <br /> <br />70CXVIB WIND DIRECTION (degrees) <br /> <br />Figure 43. --(a) Mean Daily Snowfall at Wolf Creek <br />Summit as a function of 700 mb wind direction. <br />(b) Distributions of total snowfall and total occur- <br />rences as a function of the 700 rob wind direction <br />computed over a 20-degree class interval. <br /> <br />f1i <br />~ <br />~ <br />..J ,6 <br />~ ,4 <br />6j <br />~ <br />8,2 <br />~ <br />w 0 <br />::: <br /> 10 <br />w <br />t? <br />~ <br />Z <br />~ <br />W <br />CL 5 <br />W <br />)- <br />ti <br />..J <br />~ <br /> 0 <br /> <br />(0 ) <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />(b) <br /> <br />FREWENCY OF OCCURRENCE <br /> <br />PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL <br />SNOWFALL <br /> <br />-----, <br />: <br /> <br />----I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />r--- <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />ro ~ m ~ ~ <br />700MB WIND SPEED (MPS) <br /> <br />Figure 44. --(a) Mean Daily Snowfall at Wolf Creek <br />Summit as a function of the 700 mb wind speed. <br />(b) Distribution of total snowfall and total occur- <br />rences as a function of the 700 mb wind speed com- <br />puted over a 4 mps class interval. <br /> <br />56 <br /> <br />realized per occurrence at the higher wind <br />speeds. I <br />i <br />The class interval from 7. 5 to 11. 5 <br />mps contains the peak in the f~equency of occur- <br />rence and also in total snowfaiJ.l. However <br />substantial quantities of snow iare realized' from <br />a few occurrences at wind speeds of 16 mps and <br />greater. This is indicated m9st spectacularly <br />by the mean daily snowfall. Ir the 15.5 to 19. 5 <br />mps class interval three storlJIls averaged over <br />1. 8 inches per day (water equ~valent) while one <br />storm having wind speeds of a,round 29 mps <br />produced 2.6 inches per day. ' The cases having <br />wind speeds of 15.5 mps or g~eater represent <br />only about 3% of the total cases but contribute <br />over 21 % of the total snowfall: <br /> <br />, <br />Since the rate of co:ndensation produc- <br />tion is only a linear function Of the vertical <br />motion, a more linear relationship between mean <br />daily snowfall and the speed 01' the wind over the <br />mountain barrier might be expected. This <br />relation appears to hold for w:ind speeds below <br />about 10 mps, but above this value indications <br />are that some favorable combination of factors <br />is increasing the snowfall. This may be due to <br />the superposition of the orogr,aphic influence <br />upon strong synoptic scale upyrard motions at <br />the higher wind speeds. Also', increased low <br />level convergence forced by t~e concavity of the <br />terrain may account for part 9f the non-linearity. <br /> <br />(3) Daily snowfall related to ~oisture supply <br />The 700 mb mixing;ratio is a good <br />measure of the moisture supply contained in the <br />air mass that will be lifted ov~er the mountain <br />barrier. Figure 45 ' shows the! distribution of <br />snowfall occurrences and amclunts as a function <br />of this variable computed usi~g O. 4 gm/kgm <br />class intervals. <br /> <br />, <br />-r <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />-I <br />I <br /> <br />It is apparent that tp.e center of mass <br />of the frequency distribution is displaced sub- <br />stantially toward lower moisture values from <br />the center of mass of the snowfall distribution. <br />The centers are found at 1. 95 gm/kgm and <br />2. 17 gm/kgm, respectively. iThus, the larger <br />daily snowfalls occur in association with the <br />higher 700 mb mixing ratios cis would be <br />expected. I <br /> <br />Figure 46 shows the distribution of <br />snowfall occurrences and quantity as a function <br />of this variable computed using 0.4 gm/kgm ' <br />class intervals for Wolf Creek Summit. <br /> <br />It is immediately apparent that the <br />center of mass of the -total snowfall distribution <br />is displaced substantially toward higher moisture <br />values from the center of mass of the frequency <br />distribution. The centers are found at 2.5 gm/kgfn <br />and 2.1 gm/kgm, respectively. Thus, the , <br />larger daily snowfalls occur in associatlon with <br />the higher 700 mb mixing ratios as would be <br />expected. These center of mass values are <br />higher than those observed at Climax indicating <br />more moisture is present on the average at <br />Wolf Creek Pass. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.