Laserfiche WebLink
<br />------------- - - -- ---------- <br />TABLE IV. -'--Estimate of scale changes during seeded periods with respect to <br />non-seeded periods as computed by three statistical methods. Scale changes <br />are -shown as a function of the 700 mb equivalent potential temperature. <br /> With Controls Without Controls <br /> Total Sample Scale Scale <br />Stratification Sample Size Change Change <br />(0 K) Size Utilized Method ("/0) P- Value (0/0) P- Value <br />Climax I <br />281. 0 to < 294.7 S 23 S 23 NPl -31 .074 -27 .079 <br /> NS 22 NS 22 NP2 -7 .345 -22 .074 <br /> (S20, NS2l) PAR -29 . 123 <br />294.7 to < 305.7 S 61 S 61 NPl -3 .413 -18 .156 <br /> NS 64 NS 64 NP2 -24 . 123 -12 .227 <br /> (S46, N850) PAR -1 .476 <br />305.7 to < 325.7 S 36 S 36 NPl +95 .040 +108 .054 <br /> NS 45 NS 45 NP2 +78 .089 +120 .047 <br /> (S26, N831) PAR +64 .0166 <br />Climax II <br />281. 0 to < 294.7 S 14 S 14 NPl -32 .134 -17 .164 <br /> NS 12 NS 12 NP2 -16 .264 -18 .081 <br /> (Sl1, N811) PAR -40 .142 <br />294. 7 to < 305. 7 S 28 S 28 NPl +7 .371 -5 .401 <br /> NS 34 NS 34 NP2 -50 .169 -1 .484 <br /> (S23, NS27) PAR -3 .440 <br />305.7 to < 325.7 S 19 S 19 NPl +130 .089 +95 .203 <br /> NS 20 NS 20 NP2 +6'6 .174 +112 .102 I <br /> (S15,NS15) PAR +59 .106 ,I <br />Wolf Creek Pass <br />285.0 to < 297.6 S 30 S 30 NPl -28 .100 -30 .145 <br /> NS 42 NS 41 NP2 -39 .042 -32 .099 <br /> (819, NS32) PAR -22 .164 <br />29.7. 6 to < 304. 6 S 36 S 33 NPl +23 .206 +6 .409' <br /> NS 53 NS 53 NP2 +11 .305 +7 .386 <br /> (S21, NS34) PAR +37 .085 <br />304.6 to < 309.6 S 47 S 40 NPl +24 .166 +34 .154 <br /> NS 51 NS 49 NP2 +36 ;136 +28 .212 <br /> (S23, NS26) PAR +33 . 134 <br />309.6 to < 325.6 S 51 S 44 NPl +139 .0329 >+200 .0019 <br /> NS 52 NS 38 NP2 >+200 .0146 >+200 .0048 <br /> (S31, NS29) PAR <br /> <br />Snowfall decreases appear in all <br />three samples when seeding tlE strong bar-oclinic <br />conditions. This is thought to result from extremely <br />high wind speeds that exist during many of these <br />events and this possibility will be discusSF'cl further <br />when orographic influences are considered. Vilhen <br />near barotropic conditions are seeded at Climax, <br />little effect or slight decreases are observed. Only <br />small snowfall increases are noted at Wolf Creek <br />"Summit for the same conditions. <br /> <br />d. Orographic effects <br />The orientation of the mountain <br />barrier with respect to the air flow will have impor- <br />tant bearing on the upward speed imparted to the air <br />:~rossing the mountain barrier. This in turn, is <br /> <br />vital to determining the rate at which cloud water is <br />supplied in the cloud system. It would be expected <br />that the larger supply rates would exist in flows <br />nearly normal to the mountain massif. Since the <br />Continental Divide runs east to wt:st 1n thE: Climax <br />area and southeast to northwest in the Wolf Creek <br />Pass area, one would expect that seeding effects <br />might be distributed differently with wind direction at <br />the two sites. <br /> <br />Table VII and Table VIII show seeding <br />effects distributed with the 700 mb wind direction and <br />the 500 mb wind direction respectively. At Climax <br />it is noted that snowfall increases result mainly from <br />seeding the north-northwest and south-southwest wind <br /> <br />19 <br />