Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />effects of weather components on big game. "Section 2, Ecological, <br />Wildlife, and Biocommunities," of this report series states: <br /> <br />"Various weather components seem to influence the activities <br />of many big game species: 1. game species move to areas of <br />the most available forage; 2. game species move to areas of <br />the most nutritious forage; 3. relative humidity affects the <br />length of rest periods which are longer on more humid days <br />and shorter on less humid days; 4. animals rest in areas <br />away from wind; 5. precipitation~ unless accompanied by <br />wind, does not affect the activity of game species; 6. game <br />species use higher elevation ranges during dry summers; <br />7. game species are more observable during dry summers <br />because of lack of cover and search for preferred food <br />species; 8. winter snows decrease the availability of total <br />range, cover, and food; 9. low temperatures decrease activi- <br />ties,of game species; 10. winds of 15-25 mph and low tempera- <br />tures cause game species to feed later in the morning; <br />11. low temperatures and snow depth force the congregation <br />of animals which increases their susceptibility to predation; <br />12. food availability eliminates many of the weaker animals; <br />13. migrational movements from one range to another are <br />influenced by time and/or weather; 14. spring storms can <br />reduce the condition of animals and/or reduce the number of <br />individuals in a population; 15. food habits of some species <br />change with the amount of precipitation which can be benefi- <br />. cial or detrimental; and 16. use of south facing slopes for <br />filod and north facing slopes for protection." [16, p. 8] <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Studies of the response of small mammals to winter snow accumulation in <br />the San Juan Mountains [10J do not reveal clearly predictable responses. <br />Lower population numbers seem to occur after winters with late snowpack <br />and late melt. The proximate cause seems to be springtime shortage of <br />proper food and a shortened breeding season. Other factors, such as <br />changes in land use, appear to have a more direct effect on small <br />mammal populations. The Skywater Programmatic FES states: <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />liOn the bas i s of the above fi nd i ngs, it is expected that the <br />Skywater programs of field experimentation will have no <br />discernible impact on small-mammal populations. The potential <br />impact of widespread or prolonged application of precipitation <br />management will probably involve occasional epiSOdes or <br />circumstances resulting in temporary declines in small-millnmal <br />populations. Because of the large population fluctuations <br />that normally occur, declines caused by these infrequent <br />episodes wil I be difficult to identify or attribute to <br />specific causes. There appears to be lit:;~ likelihood that <br />such .applications will significantly affec: the range of <br />diversity of small-mammal species." [2, D. 3-131j <br /> <br />The effect of additional precipitation on furbearers, reptiles, insects, <br />and birds has not been considered a controlling fac:or to the well-being <br />of the various species. Migratory birds would not be affec:ed by <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />