Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />unnoticed, or have been dismissed as inconsequen- <br />tial just a few years ago, are now often found to have <br />broader ramifications. Some of these changes are <br />quite subtle; for example, increased cloudiness asso- <br />ciated with condensation trails from jet aircraft may <br />modify the radiation budget at the ground. Others, <br />such as acid rain are more obvious; structures, veg- <br />etation, and lake water quality have all been adversely <br />affected. Air quality and visibility are often locally <br />degraded by increased anthropogenic pollutants, and <br />urban effects on temperature, humidity, wind, and <br />precipitation have been well documented. <br /> <br />2. Status of planned weather <br />modification' <br /> <br />There is growing evidence that glaciogenic seeding <br />(the use of ice-forming materials) can, under certain <br />weather conditions, successfully modify supercooled <br />fog, some orographic stratus clouds, and some con- <br />vective clouds. Recent research results, utilizing both <br />in situ and remote measurements in summer and <br />winter field programs, provide dramatic though limited <br />evidence of success in modifying shallow cold oro- <br />graphic clouds and single-cell convective clouds. Field <br />studies are beginning to define the frequencies with <br />which responsive clouds occur within specific meteo- <br />rological regimes. <br />Successful treatment of any suitable cloud requires <br />that sufficient quantities of appropriate seeding mate- <br />rials must enter the cloud in a timely, well-targeted <br />fashion. As the need for stringent spatial and temporal <br />targeting has been established, it has become appar- <br />ent that problems with seeding plume delivery in many <br />early experiments may in part accountfor the failure of <br />such programs to produce significant results. <br /> <br />a. Fog and stratus removal <br />Operations employing glaciogenic seeding todissi- <br />pate supercooled fogs and low stratus have become <br />routine at some airports. The ability to admit more <br />solar radiation to reduce heating requirements through <br />the dissipation of such clouds and fogs appears <br />promising, <br />The dissipation of warm (nonsupercooled) fogs can <br />often be accomplished by more expensive thermal <br />techniques, but this has proven cost effective at only <br />a few major airports. More reliable and economical <br />warm-fog dissipation techniques have not yet been <br />established. <br /> <br />b. Precipitation increase <br />There is considerable evidence that, under certain <br />conditions, precipitation from supercooled orographic <br /> <br />332 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />clouds can be increased with existing techniques. <br />Statistical analyses of precipitation records from some <br />long-term projects indicate that seasonal increases on <br />the order of 10% have been realized. The cause and <br />effect relationships have not been fully documented; <br />however, the potential for increases of this magnitude <br />is supported by field measurements and numerical <br />model simulations. Both ~how that SL W exists in <br />amounts sufficient to produce the observed precipi- <br />tation increases and could be tapped if proper seeding <br />technologies were applied. The processes culminat- <br />ing in increased precipitation have recently been <br />directly observed during seeding experiments con- <br />ducted over limited spatial and temporal domains. <br />While such observations further support statistical <br />analyses, they have to date been of limited scope, and <br />thus the economic impact of the increases cannot be <br />assessed. <br /> <br />Although some present precipitation <br />augmentation efforts are reportedly suc- <br />cessful, more consistent results would <br />probably be obtained if some basic im- <br />provements in seedingmethodology were <br />made. <br /> <br />Recent experiments continue to suggest that pre- <br />cipitation from single-cell and multicell convective <br />clouds may be increased, decreased, and/or redistrib- <br />uted. The response variability is not fully understood, <br />but appears to be linked to variations in targeting, <br />cloud selection criteria, and assessment methods. <br />Heavy glaciogenic seeding of some warm-based <br />convective clouds (bases about + 1 OOC or warmer) <br />can stimulate updrafts through added latent heat <br />release (a dynamic effect) and consequently increase <br />precipitation. However, convincing evidence that <br />such seeding can increase rainfall over economically <br />significant areas is not yet available. <br />Seeding to enhance coalescence or affect other <br />warm-rain processes within clouds having summit <br />temperatures warmer than about OOC has produced <br />statistically acceptable evidence of accelerated pre- <br />cipitation formation within clouds, but evidence of <br />rainfall change at the ground has not been obtained. <br />Although some present precipitation augmentation <br />efforts are reportedly successful, more consistent <br />results would probably be obtained if some basic <br />improvements in seeding methodology were made, <br />Transport of seeding materials continues to be uncer- <br />tain, both spatially and temporally, Improved delivery <br />techniques and better understanding of the subse- <br /> <br />Vol. 73, No, 3. March 1992 <br /> <br />.' <br />4 f \' \' ~ I " 1 <br />., < j) \\- I' , <br />, ,\.. \ :" J 1/,"--'\ <br />I, 1/,'1. J)' , <br />