<br />.
<br />
<br />unnoticed, or have been dismissed as inconsequen-
<br />tial just a few years ago, are now often found to have
<br />broader ramifications. Some of these changes are
<br />quite subtle; for example, increased cloudiness asso-
<br />ciated with condensation trails from jet aircraft may
<br />modify the radiation budget at the ground. Others,
<br />such as acid rain are more obvious; structures, veg-
<br />etation, and lake water quality have all been adversely
<br />affected. Air quality and visibility are often locally
<br />degraded by increased anthropogenic pollutants, and
<br />urban effects on temperature, humidity, wind, and
<br />precipitation have been well documented.
<br />
<br />2. Status of planned weather
<br />modification'
<br />
<br />There is growing evidence that glaciogenic seeding
<br />(the use of ice-forming materials) can, under certain
<br />weather conditions, successfully modify supercooled
<br />fog, some orographic stratus clouds, and some con-
<br />vective clouds. Recent research results, utilizing both
<br />in situ and remote measurements in summer and
<br />winter field programs, provide dramatic though limited
<br />evidence of success in modifying shallow cold oro-
<br />graphic clouds and single-cell convective clouds. Field
<br />studies are beginning to define the frequencies with
<br />which responsive clouds occur within specific meteo-
<br />rological regimes.
<br />Successful treatment of any suitable cloud requires
<br />that sufficient quantities of appropriate seeding mate-
<br />rials must enter the cloud in a timely, well-targeted
<br />fashion. As the need for stringent spatial and temporal
<br />targeting has been established, it has become appar-
<br />ent that problems with seeding plume delivery in many
<br />early experiments may in part accountfor the failure of
<br />such programs to produce significant results.
<br />
<br />a. Fog and stratus removal
<br />Operations employing glaciogenic seeding todissi-
<br />pate supercooled fogs and low stratus have become
<br />routine at some airports. The ability to admit more
<br />solar radiation to reduce heating requirements through
<br />the dissipation of such clouds and fogs appears
<br />promising,
<br />The dissipation of warm (nonsupercooled) fogs can
<br />often be accomplished by more expensive thermal
<br />techniques, but this has proven cost effective at only
<br />a few major airports. More reliable and economical
<br />warm-fog dissipation techniques have not yet been
<br />established.
<br />
<br />b. Precipitation increase
<br />There is considerable evidence that, under certain
<br />conditions, precipitation from supercooled orographic
<br />
<br />332
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />clouds can be increased with existing techniques.
<br />Statistical analyses of precipitation records from some
<br />long-term projects indicate that seasonal increases on
<br />the order of 10% have been realized. The cause and
<br />effect relationships have not been fully documented;
<br />however, the potential for increases of this magnitude
<br />is supported by field measurements and numerical
<br />model simulations. Both ~how that SL W exists in
<br />amounts sufficient to produce the observed precipi-
<br />tation increases and could be tapped if proper seeding
<br />technologies were applied. The processes culminat-
<br />ing in increased precipitation have recently been
<br />directly observed during seeding experiments con-
<br />ducted over limited spatial and temporal domains.
<br />While such observations further support statistical
<br />analyses, they have to date been of limited scope, and
<br />thus the economic impact of the increases cannot be
<br />assessed.
<br />
<br />Although some present precipitation
<br />augmentation efforts are reportedly suc-
<br />cessful, more consistent results would
<br />probably be obtained if some basic im-
<br />provements in seedingmethodology were
<br />made.
<br />
<br />Recent experiments continue to suggest that pre-
<br />cipitation from single-cell and multicell convective
<br />clouds may be increased, decreased, and/or redistrib-
<br />uted. The response variability is not fully understood,
<br />but appears to be linked to variations in targeting,
<br />cloud selection criteria, and assessment methods.
<br />Heavy glaciogenic seeding of some warm-based
<br />convective clouds (bases about + 1 OOC or warmer)
<br />can stimulate updrafts through added latent heat
<br />release (a dynamic effect) and consequently increase
<br />precipitation. However, convincing evidence that
<br />such seeding can increase rainfall over economically
<br />significant areas is not yet available.
<br />Seeding to enhance coalescence or affect other
<br />warm-rain processes within clouds having summit
<br />temperatures warmer than about OOC has produced
<br />statistically acceptable evidence of accelerated pre-
<br />cipitation formation within clouds, but evidence of
<br />rainfall change at the ground has not been obtained.
<br />Although some present precipitation augmentation
<br />efforts are reportedly successful, more consistent
<br />results would probably be obtained if some basic
<br />improvements in seeding methodology were made,
<br />Transport of seeding materials continues to be uncer-
<br />tain, both spatially and temporally, Improved delivery
<br />techniques and better understanding of the subse-
<br />
<br />Vol. 73, No, 3. March 1992
<br />
<br />.'
<br />4 f \' \' ~ I " 1
<br />., < j) \\- I' ,
<br />, ,\.. \ :" J 1/,"--'\
<br />I, 1/,'1. J)' ,
<br />
|