Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Agreement Number 2-AB-30-0011l0 <br /> <br />Development of a Program Plan for a <br />Precipitation Management Demonstration Activity <br /> <br />June 15 through July 17, 1992 <br /> <br />Phone conversations were held with representatives of each of the Colorado River Basin States <br />between June 22 to July 14. They revealed general satisfaction with the experimental site <br />selection processes as described in the document handed out during the June 8, 1992, Denver <br />meeting. Accordingly, detailed experimental plans and budgets will be developed for both the <br />Grand Mesa of Colorado and the Wasatch Plateau of Utah. <br /> <br />A question of obvious interest in developing a winter orographic cloud seeding program is, "how <br />much additional runoff can be expected for a given increase in snowpack?" The relationship <br />between snowpack water equivalent and runoff is known to be complex, depending upon <br />antecedent soil moisture, characteristics of individual watersheds, air temperatures and rains <br />during the snowmelt period, and other factors. However, existing snowcourse and streamflow data <br />can provide a first approximation of the runoff. that might be expected from snowfall enhancement. <br />\ <br /> <br />Snowpack-runoff relationships were investigated for several watersheds in the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin. Fourteen high elevation watersheds were identified that had at least 15 years of <br />streamflow measurements, essentially unmodified by upstream diversions or reservoirs. Total <br />April through July runoff was compared with nearby April 1 snowcourse. observations for the <br />available periods of record (16-30 years), using linear regression analysis. The least squares line of <br />best fit to each watershed's data was used to estimate the incremental runoff for a 10 percent <br />increase in the ~ snowpack. Runoff increases of about 8 percent were indicated for 3 <br />watersheds on the south-facing slopes of the Uintas in Utah. Values were 6 and 8 percent, <br />respectively, for 2 southwest-facing watersheds in the Wind River Range of Wyoming. Seven <br />Colorado watersheds had runoff increases between 10-14 percent, and two watersheds on the <br />Wasatch Plateau of Utah had increases of 19 and 21 percent, respectively. <br /> <br />It appears that a 10 percent snowpack increase during an average winter will result in at least a <br />10 percent increase in spring and summer runoff at most locations. Some watersheds had less <br />runoff, possibly due to increased evapotranspiration on their south-facing slopes. It is expected <br />that the peculiarities of individual years may cause them to v8:ry significantly from these runoff <br />estimates based on "average conditions." <br /> <br />A study was conducted into the frequency of snowfall events on the Grand Mesa and Wasatch <br />Plateau, using Soil Conservation Service SNOTEL data available the past decade. It appears that <br />the frequency of daily snowfalls, and the April 1 snowpack water equivalent, are similar for the <br />two potential experimental areas. During an average winter (November through March), 35-40 <br />percent of all days have measurable snowfall on both mountain barriers, resulting in April 1 snow <br />water equivalents near 20 inches. <br /> <br />A literature review was started to compare SLW (supercooled liquid water) information between <br />the Grand Mesa and Wasatch Plateau. The availability of SLW is essential for cloud seeding <br />potential. Microwave radiometer SL W observations were made on or near both locations, but for <br />limited periods. Original data from the Grand Mesa, collected by Reclamation in 1983-1985, are <br />being examined. It is hoped that SL W flux estimates can be made to compare with similar <br />estimates published in final reports for the Tushur Mountains of southern Utah. <br />