Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />increase with wind speed. This is because some of the air flows upward over the gauge <br />orifice, reducing the "catch" of slowly falling snowflakes. Various types of windshields <br />have been used to reduce gauge undercatch, but none satisfactorily solves the problem in <br />the windy areas common in mountain regions. The most practical solution appears to be <br />to locate gauges in small protected clearings where conifer forest is available. Of course, <br />many mountains have significant areas above timberline where this is not possible. <br />Large open areas are common even below timberline. Special structures have been <br />constructed to shield gauges in windy places (e.g., the Wyoming gauge), but reported <br />results have been mixed. There is no proven satisfactory method to measure surface <br />snowfall in windy, open areas. It is, therefore, prudent to consider the availability of <br />conifer forest cover when selecting an experimental area (deciduous trees which shed their <br />leaves before winter are usually unsuitable for shielding gauges). <br /> <br />We will summarize the characteristics of an "ideal" mountain barrier for weather <br />modification experimentation. Most winter storms in the West are characterized by <br />ridgetop-Ievel airflow between southwest to northwest. Thus, the ideal barrier would <br />have a long north-south extent to force the prevailing airflow over rather than around the <br />barrier. The mountain barrier would have a wide top with limited local relief, or possibly <br />have two parallel ridges bisected by a north-south valley. In the latter case at least the <br />downwind target ridge would be fairly wide with limited relief on top. The barrier would <br />be high enough to have permanent snowcover from sometime in November until late in <br />the spring, thereby providing a long experimental season. It.is essential that the highest <br />terrain exceed approximately 2740 m (9000 ft) in order to provide a SLW zone near the <br />surface cold enough for effective AgI seeding for several months each winter. Moreover, <br />most snow accumulation is above the 9000 ft contour as discussed by Weisbecker (1972). <br />This 9000 ft requirement excludes the Mogollon Rim of Arizona which has an <br />intermittent winter snowpack and rather warm temperatures at levels likely to be <br />affected by ground-based silver iodide generators. Super et ale (1989) pointed out that <br />aircraft seeding would likely be required for most winter storms over the Mogollon Rim. <br /> <br />The ideal barrier would have a high frequency of winter storm passages. That need is <br />significantly better satisfied in the Upper Colorado Basin than in the Lower Basin. Even <br />within the Upper Basin, a marked south-to-north increase in storm frequency is known to <br />exist. All else being equal, the "ideal" experimental area would be as far north as <br />possible to provide the highest storm frequency and also the colder storms more likely to <br />be seedable with ground-released agents. However, from the standpoint of transferability <br />of results, an experimental area near the higher terrain portions of the Basin would be <br />preferable. <br /> <br />The ideal experimental area would not be near a wilderness area, including upwind and <br />downwind of the target. Release of seeding agents and various measurements of cloud <br />characteristics need to be made upwind of the target. Measurements of at least <br />precipitation should be made for some distance downwind of the intended target to <br />investigate the distance over which seeding has a detectable effect (Le., "downwind <br />effects"). <br /> <br />5 <br />