My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP13032
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP13032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 1:54:38 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 10:24:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8280.10
Description
CREST - Colorado River Enhanced Snowpack Test - Precipitation Management Demonstration Program
State
CO
Date
6/8/1992
Author
CREST Participants
Title
Colorado River Basin Experimental Site Selection - Draft of 6/8/92
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />precipitation processes may be more typical of the majority of high terrain in the Basin <br />than the Wasatch Plateau located on the west edge of the Basin. <br /> <br />The Mesa is believed to have much more conifer forest so that fmding suitable <br />precipitation gauge sites would be easier than on the Plateau. As discussed earlier, well- <br />protected gauge sites are very important for an experimental program. <br /> <br />The Plateau has an excellent all-weather highway system to and around its top while <br />winter operations on the east end of the Mesa would require snowmobile travel from <br />lower elevations. <br /> <br />The Mesa top averages about 1500 ft higher than the Plateau. Since they are at <br />essentially the same latitude, a higher frequency of colder storms, seedable with AgI, can <br />be expected on the Mesa. <br /> <br />The Plateau has an lower altitude barrier upwind of it that may be suitable for operation <br />of ground-based generators. A lower barrier exists upwind of the Mesa as well, but at <br />significantly greater distance which might make it difficult to target from it. <br /> <br />Both areas have been seeded operationally, especially the Plateau, suggesting local <br />interest and support. The State of Utah has partially supported operational seeding on <br />the Plateau and elsewhere in Utah for about 20 years, and has been involved in cloud <br />seeding research for over 10 years. The State of Colorado has not been directly involved <br />in supporting operational or experimental seeding since 1978. <br /> <br />Both areas have been used for cloud seeding research in recent years so a reasonably good <br />understanding of logistics, and of cloud and precipitation processes, exists for both. <br /> <br />The Plateau has considerable private land as well as U.S. Forest Service land so that less <br />restrictions may exist for locating facilities than on the Mesa Y1hich is almost wholly <br />administrated by the U.S. Forest Service. <br /> <br />It is not clear at this time whether the Grand Mesa or Wasatach Plateau should be <br />recommended as the "best" experimental site. More detailed site surveys, discussions <br />with State and local interests and the U.S. Forest Service, and consideration of <br />environmental concerns should all be addressed before making that judgement. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.