My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12833
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSPC12833
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:47 PM
Creation date
4/11/2008 9:58:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8103
Description
Preliminary Report on Water Legislation Investigation for the Arkansas River Basin
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
12/1/1967
Author
Coordinator of Natural Resources
Title
Preliminary Report on Water Legislation Investigations for the Arkansas River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Canal diversions I~ere reduced by about 20 percent. These two canals <br />were selected for this type of study as they have junior operating de- <br />crees and because they supply approximately 40 percent of the irrigated <br />land between Pueblo and the State LIne. There are about 3l0,OOO acres <br />of irrigated land within this stretch of the river. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The consllmptive use of water diverted is also of extreme <br />importance in any study. This was investigated and three different <br />values for the consumptive use of irrigation water were found In the <br />basic data obtained from state and federal sources. These variations <br />were caused by the use of different cropping patterns requiring <br />different amounts of water. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-s- <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Another vital element which must be included in any solution <br />of the water management problem in the Arkansas River Valley is <br />water qual ity. The reuse of water has resulted in its progressive <br />deterioration downstream. From Lamar to the State Line the salt content <br />is so high at times that crop yields have been reduced; consequently, <br />the need for additional water to maintain a reasonable salt balance <br />must not be overlooked. Any reduction in the flow at and below John <br />Martin Reservoir through better management of the water resources <br />above must be approached with caution and allowances made to compensate <br />for a change in the water qual ity. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Concern was expressed by water users and governmental agencIes <br />that the present method of operating John MartIn Reservoir has resulted <br />in an inefficient use of the water stored therein in Colorado. Studies <br />were made of John Martin Reservoir releases and diversions and needs <br />by three of the largest Colorado canals below the res2rvoir. These <br />studies indicate that this concern is well founded and that better <br />management of this water should be incorporated in any basin plan of <br />water management. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />While there is little doubt that substantial benefits are <br />derived from winter irrigation; nevertheless, it is recognized that <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.