Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5. The pros and cons of reregu1ating water supplies to <br />the various ditches through the integrated use of <br />surface and ground water supplies. <br /> <br />6. The "cash register" approach, which provides that <br />water users in the basin pay a fee which, in theory, <br />would be proportional to the benefits derived. <br /> <br />We reviewed all published and unpublished reports and <br />acquired basic data and studies which might relate to the subject. <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board provided data relating to deple- <br />tion studies, the location, capacity and yield of irrIgation wells, <br />water storage In John Martin Reservoir and consumptive use investi- <br />gations. The U. S. Geological Survey provided information on the <br />capacity, use and volume of water pumped by wells and information <br />which could be used to relate pumpage of a particular well to its <br />effect on the river system. The U. 5. Bureau of Reclamation, through <br />the Frying Pan Arkansas Project office in Pueblo, provIded water <br />operation studies for canals between Pueblo and La Junta, historic <br />canal diversions, ideal canal requirements and Importation of Frying <br />Pan Arkansas Project water for use by individuals under contract with <br />the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District. AddItional data <br />was obtained from the office of the State Engineer and from Colorado <br />State University. <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br /> <br />SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS <br /> <br />After a thorough review of all pertinent data, it was apparent <br />that additional studies were warranted. One such study was a comparison <br />of mass diagrams on a yearly basis of the stream flow at Pueblo versus <br />time and of the irrigation season diversions by all canals between <br />Pueblo and La Junta versus time on a yearly basis. These dIagrams <br />revealed no material deviation of the inflow at Pueblo between 1943 and <br />1965. Contrasted to this, the diagram of surface diversions during <br />the irrigation season showed a marked reduction in these diversions <br />beginning in the early 1950's when the pumping of ground water was <br />increased materially. The decrease In these surface diversions, as <br />