My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP13027
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP13027
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 1:54:41 PM
Creation date
4/10/2008 4:46:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.767
Description
Little Snake River Management Project
State
CO
Author
CWCB
Title
Little Snake River Water Management Project - Background (part of a larger, undated document)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />. <br /> <br />Water use projects initiated <br />after the signing of this <br />compact, to the greatest <br />extent possible, shall permit <br />the full use within the basin <br />in the most feasible manner of <br />the waters of the Little Snake <br />River and its tributaries, <br />without regard to the state <br />line: and, so far as is <br />practicable, shall result in <br />an equal diversion between the <br />states of the use of water not <br />used under rights existing <br />prior to the signing of this <br />compact. <br /> <br />It would appear that this section raises some very <br />interesting questions,since these projects are all subsequent to <br />the signing of the compact. For instance, is Colorado entitled <br />to a similar amount of water that is currently being depleted by <br />Cheyenne's Stage I and will be depleted by Stage II and III? <br />Would any water that Wyoming developed in this basin have to be <br />shared equally with Colorado? <br /> <br />Conclusion <br /> <br />There are two important actions that Colorado must take in <br />order to evaluate the ramifications of the LSRWMP. The first <br />should include a thorough analysis of our legal rights to these <br />waters under the Upper Colorado River Compact. The second should <br />include an analysis of Colorado's ability to utilize any <br />developed water in this basin or in the Yampa River basin. It is <br />my estimate, based on reading the Savery-Pot Hook Reports, that <br />Colorado could utilize supplemental and full service irrigation <br />water on about 15,000 acres. <br /> <br />DLL/gl <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.