Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Stratus Consulting <br /> <br />Existing Funding Sources <br /> <br />Improvement District, General Improvement District, Special Improvement District, Authority, <br />and Power or Water Authority. This is not a full list of the entities covered, but the document <br />does not cover water conservancy districts or a number -of other special-purposed districts or <br />authorities. The idea is that if a governmental entity can be formed where that entity is subject to <br />the same requirements for public meetings, budgeting, and other requirements that governmental <br />entities are held to, then the private nonprofit will give up some control but gain access to more <br />types of funding sources. <br /> <br />Many of the funding providers and technical assistance providers in Colorado at least mention to <br />PNPWSs that forming a governmental entity is a possibility to consider, especially when looking <br />for more funding sources. In response to demand for information on becoming a governmental <br />entity, Colorado Rural Water hosted several workshops in 2006-2007 to help private water <br />systems understand what is involved in becoming a public entity. <br /> <br />Some counties in Colorado encourage physical interconnection and or merging with existing <br />systems as a policy. Others have a policy to strongly suggest that systems consider becoming <br />governmental entities. <br /> <br />Some private systems are resistant to giving up control oftheir systems or their water rights, and <br />will continue to refuse the notion of forming a governmental entity. And while some counties <br />actively encourage new systems to be annexed or interconnect, other counties are not so active in <br />shaping new development. So, although the idea of becoming or joining governmental entities <br />will continue to be an influence on the number of existing and new PNPWSs, it does not appear <br />that it will either stop the growth of new PNPWSs or greatly change the current number of <br />PNPWSs. <br /> <br />3.3.2 What about requiring TMF capacity development as a condition for funding? <br /> <br />Section 2.4 detailed some of the concerns with the long-term sustainability ofPNPWSs. One of <br />the approaches to funding that holds some promise to also help water systems learn how to <br />become more stable in the long-term is to require that water systems demonstrate or gain TMF <br />capacity as a condition of the loan. This approach is taken with SDWRF, and there is a list of <br />TMF questions developed by CDPHE and approved by EP A that will allow a system to <br />demonstrate TMF capacity or agree to gain capacity in any deficient areas as a condition of the <br />loan. This approach may be a tool to help lessen some of the risk associated with loaning to <br />PNPWSs. <br /> <br />A variety of technical assistance providers in the state can help with achieving TMF capacity. <br />RCAC, Colorado Rural Water, DOLA, CDPHE, and other organizations provide technical <br />assistance designed to help systems gain capabilities. CDPHE has a capacity development <br /> <br />Page 3-6 <br />SCll199 <br /> <br />