My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP13016
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP13016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:41 PM
Creation date
4/3/2008 11:02:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.600.10.B
Description
2000 Annual Operating Plan
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
29th Annual Report and 2000 Annual Operating Plan for Colorado Riber System Reservoirs
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Lower Basin Reservoirs <br /> <br />Water shall be released or pumped from Lake Mead to meet the following requirements: <br /> <br />(a) <br />(b) <br /> <br />1944 Mexican Water Treaty obligations; <br />Reasonable beneficial consumptive use requirements of mainstream users in <br />the Lower Division States; <br />Net river losses; <br />Net reservoir losses; <br />Regulatory wastes; and <br />Flood control. <br /> <br />.~ <br />)~ <br />f~~ \; <br />v-4' <br />~.J' ~I <br />u 0' ~ <br />p/J PtY <br />The Operating Criteria provide that after the commencement of delivery of mainstream water by ~:p.r \~ <br />means of the CAP, the Secretary of the Interior will determine the extent to which the reasonable ()..IT ~? <br />1- <br />beneficial consumptive use requirements of mainstream users are met in the Lower Division \'~!1 <br />States. The reasonable beneficial consumptive use requirements are met depending on whether fI'.\; V~J <br />a normal, surplus, or shortage condition has been determined. The normal condition is defined (\I,ra-c, ,/'P' <br />as annual pumping and release from Lake Mead sufficient to satisfY 9,251 MCM (7.500 MAF) kr1,9 <br />of consumptive use in accordance with Article ill(3)(a) of the Operating Criteria and Article /~ <br />II(B)(I) of the U.S. Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California. The surplus condition is ~vJ ~~t'~ <br />defined as annual pumping and release from Lake Mead sufficient to satisfY in excess of 9 ,251;~ tI b :J.. <br />MCM (7.500 MAF) of consumptive use in accordance with Article m(3)(b) of the Operating ~~')~ <br />Criteria and Article II(B)(2) of the U.S. Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California. \)e\' <br /> <br />(c) <br />(d) <br />(e) <br />(f) <br /> <br />The current water supply conditions forecast mandatory flood control releases that are projected <br />to be above downstream requirements in January and February of calendar year 2000. Using a <br />most probable inflow forecast for 2000, flood control releases are also projected in the beginning <br />of calendar year 2001. Therefore, taking into account (1) the existing water storage conditions <br />in the basin, (2) the most probable near-term water supply conditions in the basin, and (3) that <br />the beneficial consumptive use requirements of Colorado River mainstream users in the Lower <br />Division States are expected to be more than 9,250 MCM (7.5 MAF), the surplus condition is <br />the criterion governing the operation of Lake Mead for calendar year 2000 in accordance with <br />Article m(3)(b) of the Operating Criteria and Article II(B)(2) of the decree in Arizona v. <br />California. <br /> <br />While there still is no agreed upon long term strategy for the determination of surplus conditions, <br />the making ofthis determination, based on flood control and spill avoidance considerations, does <br />not preclude the Secretary from adopting other determination criteria in future years. <br />Reclamation has initiated the National Environmental Policy Act process and has solicited <br />comments on the development of specific surplus criteria for management of the Colorado River <br />in a Federal Register notice on May 18, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg., No. 95, p. 27008). Reclamation <br />continues to work on the development of specific surplus criteria. <br /> <br />Nothing in the decree in Arizona v. California prohibits the SecretaIy of the Interior from <br />releasing water apportioned, but unused, in any Lower Division State for that year for <br /> <br />December 1, 1999 <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.