Laserfiche WebLink
<br />January 7, 2004 IS <br />The criteria used for determining a water sh0l1age in 2003 was based on protecting elevation 5,990 <br />feet (the top of the inactive pool) at Navajo Reservoir, with future inflows assumed to be at <br />minimum probable levels (90 percent exceedance). When the water surface elevation at Navajo <br />Reservoir was projected to fall below 5,990 feet in 2003, with projected inflows at the minimum <br />probable level, a water supply shortfall was determined. Using this methodology, a shortage <br />percentage was determined each month in 2003 in the San Juan River Basin for all the endorsing <br />parties. This percent shortage was also applied toward the 500 cfs (14 ems) target flow from <br />Shiprock to Lake Powell. The shortage was recalculated each month for planning purposes (due to <br />changing hydrologic conditions) and varied between 0 and 33 percent in 2003; but in October of <br />2003 the calculated shortage was reduced to zero, as late summer rains in August and <br />September increased inflow into Navajo Reservoir above levels forecasted earlier in the year. <br />Storage in Navajo Reservoir remains low, however. As water year 2003 ended, storage in Navajo <br />was the lowest it has been since 1968, before the first filling of the reservoir. It is anticipated that a <br />similar shortage-sharing agreement will be developed in 2004. <br /> <br />Reclamation is proceeding through a National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) process on the <br />implementation of an operation at Navajo Dam that meets the Flow Recommendations or a <br />reasonable alternative to them. A Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement <br />(EIS) was filed on October 1, 1999, in the Federal Register. A draft EIS was released on September <br />4, 2002. The completion of the final EIS is scheduled to occur late in December 2003 with the <br />Record of Decision to follow in January 2004. <br /> <br />Navajo Reservoir is not expected to fill in 2004 under the minimum probable, most probable or even <br />the maximum probable inflow scenario. Releases from the reservoir will be 250 cfs (7 cms) to 500 <br />cfs ( 14 cms) through the fall and winter depending upon the outcome of discussions between stake - <br />holder groups in the San Juan River Basin and the EIS. Large spring releases as provided for in the <br />Flow Recommendations are not likely to take place in 2004 due to the continuation of severe <br />drought conditions in the San Juan River Basin and because of scheduled maintenance on the <br />tandem outlet gates at Navajo Dam. <br /> <br />Lake Powell <br /> <br />Four years of drought in the Colorado River Basin has reduced water storage in Lake Powell. When <br />drought conditions began in the autumn of 1999, Lake Powell was nearly full (95 percent of capacity <br />on September 30, 1999). As water year 2003 ended on September 30, 2003, Lake Powell storage <br />had been reduced to 12.1 maf(14,900 mcm) or 50 percent of capacity. <br /> <br />. Lake Powell began water year 2003 with 14.5 maf(17,800 mcm) of water in storage (59 percent of <br />capacity). Storage in Lake Powell at that time was 2.6 maf(3,200 mcm) lower than that of Lake <br />Mead. Because of reduced storage, and Lake Powell storage being below Lake Mead, releases from <br />Glen CanyonDam were scheduled to maintain the minimum release objective from Lake Powell of <br />8.23 maf (10,150 mcm) for water year 2003 in accordance with Article 11(2) of the Operating <br />Criteria. Forecasted inflow to Lake Powell was significantly below average throughout water year <br />2003, and storage equalization releases between Lake Mead and Lake Powell were not required. <br />The total release from Lake Powell in water year 2003 was 8.23 maf(10,150 mcm). <br />