My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP13010
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP13010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:39 PM
Creation date
4/3/2008 9:55:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.600.10
Description
2005 Annual Operating Plan
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Author
Varied
Title
2005 Annual Operating Plan News Articles and Editorials
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Page 3 of3 <br /> <br /> <br />The Pueblo Chieftain Online <br /> <br />building an intake at a lower elevation. <br /> <br />Under the 1922 compact, the Upper Basin states are entitled to 7.5 million acre- <br />feet as well, with Colorado receiving 51 percent under a 1929 compact among <br />Upper Basin states. However, the hydrology of the basin was overestimated during <br />the wet years leading up to the 1922 compact, and the Upper Basin receives on <br />average about 6 million acre-feet a year. <br /> <br />The Upper Basin states are not making full use of their compact entitlements, <br />using only about 4.4 million acre-feet. Meanwhile, growth in California, Arizona <br />and Nevada has created full consumption of compact entitlements. In fact, <br />California was ordered to scale back its use of Colorado River water from 5.2 <br />million acre-feet to 4.4 million acre-feet in recent years. <br /> <br />WHY IT MATTERS <br /> <br />The Colorado River may be on the other side of the Continental Divide, but <br />the Arkansas River Basin depends heavily on diversions from the Western <br />Slope. <br /> <br />- Jim Lochhead, a lawyer who has worked on the Colorado River Compact for <br />years in various capacities, advised local water leaders in January that a call on <br />Lake Powell by downstream states could reduce transmountain diversions with <br />appropriation dates after 1922. The only transmountain transfers that predate the <br />compact are rights owned by the Pueblo Board of Water Works. <br /> <br />- The Arkansas River Basin imported an average of 102,200 acre-feet per year of <br />water from the Colorado River Basin from 1980-2004, said Water Division 2 <br />Engineer Steve Witte. That amounted to almost 20 percent of the flow of the <br />Arkansas at Canon City, which is about 526,000 acre-feet annually. The largest <br />diversions are made by the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Twin Lakes and the <br />Pueblo Board of Water Works system (Ewing, Wurtz, Columbine and Busk- <br />Ivanhoe). <br /> <br />- The Homestake Project, which provides water to Colorado Springs and Aurora, <br />diverted another 24,770 acre-feet per year into the Arkansas and South Platte <br />basins. Witte said those diversions have an impact on Arkansas River operations <br />upstream of the Otero Pumping Station and through exchanges as Colorado <br />Springs reuses the water. <br /> <br />- Aurora plans to divert about 22,500 acre-feet of water from the Arkansas to the <br />South Platte. Its water comes from agricultural transfers in the Lower Arkansas <br />Valley made over the last 20 years. <br /> <br />Note: An acre-foot is 325,851 gallons. <br /> <br />@1996-2005The Pueblo Chieftain Online <br /> <br />http://www.chieftain.comlprint. php ?article=/metro/1114699925/2 <br /> <br />4/28/2005 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.