Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2005 ,,, ATER SUPPLY ASSUMPTIONS <br /> <br />For 2005 operations, three reservoir unregulated inflow scenarios were developed and analyz.ed, and <br />are labeled as probable maximum, most probable, and probable minimum. The attached graphs <br />show these inflow scenarios with associated release patterns and end-of-month contents for each <br />reservOIr. <br /> <br />Although there is considerable uncertainty associated with streamflow forecasts and reservoir <br />operating plans made a year in advance, these projections are valuable in analyzing probable impacts <br />on project uses and purposes. The magnitude ofinflows in each of these three inflow scenarios for <br />2005 are below the historical upper decile, mean, and lower decile (10 percent exce:edance, <br />50 percentexceedance, and 90 percent exceedance, respectively). The volume of inflow is reduced <br />in each ofthe three scenarios due to dry antecedent conditions in the Colorado River Basin resulting <br />from five consecutive years of below average precipitation. The National Weather Service's <br />Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) model was used to develop inflows for the three scenarios <br />for 2005. The ESP modeling showed that even with average temperatures and precipitation in 2005, <br />runoff in the Colorado River Basin is likely to remain below average due to dry antecedent <br />conditions. Most probable inflow for Lake Powell in water year 2005 is 9.23 maf(11,380 mcm) or <br />77 percent of average. Most probable inflow is 2.83 maf (3,490 mcm) less than the 30 year a.verage <br />of 12.06 maf (14,870 mcm). Minimum probable inflow to Lake Powell in water year 2005 is 3.75 <br />maf (4,630 mcm) or 31 percent of average (2.40 mafless than the statistical 90 percent exceedance <br />level). Maximum probable inflow is 15.3 maf(18,800 mcm) or 127 percent of average (2.89 maf <br />less than the statistical 1 0 percent exceedance level). The three inflow scenarios for Lake Powell are <br />shown in Tables 2(a) and 2(b). <br /> <br />The volume ofinflow resulting from these assumptions was used as input into Reclamation's <br />monthly reservoir simulation model. This model is used to plan reservoir operations for the <br />upcoming 24-month period. Proj ected water year 2005 inflow and October 1,2004, reservoir storage <br />conditions were used as input to this model; and monthly :releases were adjusted until release and <br />storage levels best accomplished project purposes. <br /> <br />6 <br />