Laserfiche WebLink
Mapping the Colorado Basin Rou ndtable’s Water Policy Networks <br />Protecting Consumptive Needs cluster. Overall, they reported less success than the average <br /> <br />roundtable member on most of the questions. <br />Perceptions of HB11 77 Process Success <br />The survey respondents who were identified by Colorado Basin Roundtable members, but are <br />not part of that roundtable, were asked the same questions, but more broadly focused on the <br />overall HB1177 process. Similar to the Colorado Basin Roundtable member’s report on their <br />own roundtable’s success, most respondents reported only moderate or less success for the <br />overall HB1177 process. Respondents who were participating in any manner on a roundtable <br />other than the Colorado Basin or the IBCC were more positive about roundtable successes than <br />non-roundtable members. However, they were only significantly more likely to report that the <br />HB1177 process has been successful at fostering dialogue <br />: <br />Key Finding 3.2 <br />and collaboration within basins and across basins. This <br />Respondents who are <br />suggests that respondents in the roundtable process have <br />participating in the <br />seen an increase in dialogue and collaboration that is not yet <br />roundtable process were <br />evident to those outside the process. <br />more likely to report it has <br />been successful at fostering <br />The three activities that were seen by everyone as the most <br />dialogue and collaboration <br />successful to date are developing a grants process, <br />within basins and across <br />educating the roundtable members, and fostering <br />basins. <br />collaboration within the Colorado basin. <br />Table 3.3: Average Perceptions of HB1177 Process Success <br />RT Non-RT <br />Strongly Agree <br />Agree <br />Neither Agree <br /> or Disagree <br />Disagree <br /> Strongly Disagree <br />Colorado Institute of Public Policy 29 of 64 <br />