My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CSIReportColoradoBasinRoundtable
CWCB
>
Interbasin Compact Committee
>
DayForward
>
CSIReportColoradoBasinRoundtable
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2010 8:31:19 AM
Creation date
4/3/2008 9:24:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Interbasin Compact Committee
Working Group
Public Education, Participation and Outreach
Title
Mapping the Colorado Basin Roundtable's Water Policy Networks
Date
3/1/2008
Author
Colorado Institute of Public Policy
Interbasin CC - Doc Type
General Resources
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mapping the Colorado Basin Rou ndtable’s Water Policy Networks <br />A <br />GRICULTURE <br />More so than any other cluster, the nineteen respondents in this cluster focus on <br />agricultural needs specifically and consum ptive needs in general. They want the <br />roundtable process to protect individual water rights and the prior appropriation doctrine. They <br />are not supportive of non-consumptive needs as a priority in the state. Those from the Western <br />Slope prioritize protecting Western Slope water from transmountain diversions. <br />Analysis of Survey Statements of Support: Members of this cluster are: <br /> Highly supportive of cooperation among basins, balancing water supply and demand, <br />agricultural interests, and protecting existing individual water rights; and <br /> Not supportive of water transfers to high growth sectors and non-consumptive needs. <br />Desired Outcomes of Colorado <br />Examples of Desired Outcomes of Colorado Basin <br />Basin Roundtable Respondents: All <br />Roundtable Respondents: <br />the Colorado Basin Roundtable <br />“No impact to water rights.” <br />members in this group support <br />“Preserve, protect, and enhance water availability in <br />protecting individual water rights, <br />western Colorado.” <br />and most emphasize Western <br />Slope needs. References to <br />“Non-consumptive uses should not expect special <br />cooperation and consensus are <br />attention to achieve their goals.” <br />also articulated, but within the <br />“Consumptive use is prioritized over non-consumptive <br />context of needing to preserve <br />use.” <br />individual water rights and meeting <br />consumptive water needs. <br />Examples of Desired Outcomes of <br />Desired Outcomes of External Respondents: No <br />External Respondents: <br />external stakeholders in this cluster live in the <br /> “Keeping water for agricultural <br />Denver-metro area, but some live in the northern <br />production.” <br />and southern parts of the Front Range. Half of the <br />“Safeguarding the time-tested and <br />external stakeholders in this cluster are from the <br />generation-invested prior <br />Western Slope. The desired outcomes prioritized <br />appropriation doctrine.” <br />by these stakeholders heavily focus on agriculture, <br />consumptive use, protecting current rights, and <br />“Develop models that are beneficial <br />to agriculture.” <br />reuse of water. Some stakeholders also want to <br />increase stakeholder understanding of <br />“Limits on diversions from the West <br />consumptive and agriculture water issues and <br />Slope to the East Slope.” <br />protecting Western Slope water. <br /> <br />B N <br />ALANCING EEDS <br />The fifty respondents in this cluster are from throughout Colorado and prioritize a <br />wide range of water uses, including agricultural, municipal, environmental, and <br />recreational. They share in common a desire to develop a collaborative, inclusive process to <br />find cooperative solutions that meet multiple needs. They also emphasize the importance of <br />increasing knowledge individually and in the br oader water community. As many respondents <br />in this cluster do prioritize one need over another, their emphasis on cooperation may be based <br />in a pragmatic belief that their prioritized needs cannot be met unless all interests are being <br />included and addressed. <br />Colorado Institute of Public Policy 18 of 64 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.