Laserfiche WebLink
Mapping the Colorado Basin Rou ndtable’s Water Policy Networks <br />counties is to be expected. Southeastern Colorado was the least represented area among the <br />respondents, and overall East Slope respondents tended to be in the more populated Front <br />Range counties. See Figure 1.1 for county by county distribution of the respondents. <br />Affiliations <br />Respondents reported 44 different types of affiliations, which were grouped into seven general <br />3 <br />categories. Respondents were allowed to select multiple affiliations to capture most accurately <br />their role in the water community. “Any elected or appointed public position” refers to municipal, <br />county, and state level elected positions. Similarly, “Any government position, non-elected” <br />refers to non-elected government staff at the municipal, county, state, and federal level. Those <br />affiliated with quasi-governmental water districts were not included in the government <br />categories, but rather in a separate affiliation, “Water districts.” “Other affiliations” refers to <br />individuals who reported themselves as consultant s, private industry, non-profit, or some other <br />role that does not fall into any of the categories specifically related to water and water interests <br />that were included in the affiliation list. <br />Table 1.1: Self-Reported Affiliations of All Respondents <br />Number of Percent of <br />Affiliations of All Respondents <br />Respondents Respondents* <br />Any elected or appointed public position 17 10.4% <br />Any government position, non-elected 59 36.0% <br />Agriculture 16 9.8% <br />Environment and recreation 37 22.6% <br />Water districts 49 29.9% <br />Water industry 35 21.3% <br />Other affiliation 27 16.5% <br />* Percentages add up to more than 100 as respondents were permitted to select up to three affiliations. <br />  <br />3 <br /> Each respondent was allowed to identify up to three affilia tions, selecting from a list of 44 options. To create the <br />seven categories of affiliations, the 44 options were grouped as follows: <br /> Any elected or appointed public position: Elected Office: Muni cipal, Elected Office: County, Elected Office: <br /> <br />State, Other: Colorado Water Conservation Board. <br /> Any government position, non-elect ed: Non-Elected Government: Municipal, Non-Elected Government: County, <br /> <br />Non-Elected Government: State, Non-Elected Government: Federal. <br /> Agriculture: Consultant: Agricultur e, Other Private Enterprises: Rainfe d/Dryland Agricultur e, Other Private <br /> <br />Enterprises: Irrigated Agriculture. <br /> Environment and recreation: Consultant: Water qualit y, Consultant: Environmental/conservation, Non- <br />Governmental/Non-Profit: Environmental Group, Non- Governmental/Non-Profit: Watershed Group, Non- <br />Governmental/Non-Profit: Land Trust, Non-Government al/Non-Profit: Conservation Group, Consultant: <br />Recreation, Other Private Enterprises: Recreati on/Tourism Company, Non- Governmental/Non-Profit: <br /> <br />Recreation Group. <br /> Water districts: Special Districts: Water Conservation District; Special Districts: Water Conservancy District; <br /> <br />Special Districts: Irrigation District; Spec ial Districts: Other special district; Special Districts: Rural Water District. <br /> Water industry: Consultant: Governme ntal Relations; Other Private Enterpri ses: Research Institute/University; <br />Other Private Enterprises: Engineering Firm/Consultan t; Other Private Enterprises: Legal Firm/Consultant; <br /> <br />Consultant: Water Resources; Other Pr ivate Enterprises: Public Utility. <br /> Other affiliation: Other A ffiliations: Any other affiliation; Non-Gove rnmental/Non-Profit: Other-Non Profit; Other <br /> <br />Private Enterprises: Other; Consultant: Other consultant. <br />Colorado Institute of Public Policy 12 of 64 <br />