Laserfiche WebLink
Animas River at Durango <br />The peak seasonal/HCI relationships in this basin appear to behave in a manner <br />very similar to that of the San Juan River at Pagosa Springs. The physical orientation of <br />the basin is similar to the Animas and thus, there the similarities are not overwhelmingly <br />surprising. The reader is directed to the prior section for the San Juan River for details. <br />Dolores at Rico <br />This river produces a much lower amount of natural runoff than the San Juan and <br />Animas Rivers however; users in this basin rely on surface water in this location as well. <br />Unfortunately, it appears that there is no real notable relationship with the naturalized <br />flow and the HCI values, if anything it is far less notable than the neighboring basins. A <br />potential explanation is that the basin is oriented more north-south than the San <br />Juan/Animas basins therefore the influx of moisture into the region from a <br />south/southwesterly direction is far less orthogonal than earlier thought. <br />Table 6. Summary of Apr.-Sep. Naturalized Streamflow/HCI Relationships for the San Juan/Dolores <br />(‘X’ indicates a relatively strong relationship and ’O’ indicates a relatively weak relationship). <br />PDOMEISOINino 3.4 NAOAMO <br />District 30 X <br />OO <br />District 32 XXX <br />District 34 XXX <br />District 71 OOX <br />F - Single Seasonal Runoff Timing <br />The timing aspect of the runoff in the basin was examined by looking at the <br />comparison of the Julian Date of the 50% point of the April-July peak seasonal flow <br />verses the HCI values. Before this was performed (period of available record 1975- <br />2003), it was necessary to determine the relationship of the date of 50% flow and the <br />actual volume of that year. In the case of the flow of the Animas River at Durango, the <br />overall relationship between 50% flow and the volume was significant enough that we <br />examined the residual (or in effect taking out the effects of volume) to determine the <br />seasonal melting effect. <br />The net result in looking at this variable was that El Nino years did have a <br />tendency to have a delayed runoff in the basin (at least from reaching the 50% of total <br />flow while La Nina years were earlier). It is unsure what impact temperatures may have <br />on this tendency or if it relates to some extent, to the tendency of more precipitation in <br />the spring with El Nino, delaying the runoff. <br />25 <br />