My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00274 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00274 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:32:14 PM
Creation date
4/2/2008 2:46:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Hydro-Climate Index Study - Final Report
Prepared By
HDR Engineering
Date
2/14/2008
County
Statewide
State
CO
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table 2. Summary of Apr.-Jun. Precipitation/HCI Relationships (‘X’ indicates a relatively strong <br />relationship and ’O’ indicates a relatively weak relationship). <br />PDOMEISOINino 3.4 NAOAMO <br />District 26 <br />O <br />District 20 OO <br />District 35 <br />OO <br />C -Summer Precipitation (July-September) – Single Seasonal Totals <br />Districts 26, 20 and 35 <br />Unfortunately, little useful information was gleaned from this segment of <br />information as the connections between the HCI variables and all three districts were <br />minimal, at best. This factor may show that even in dry years these basins may have some <br />average precipitation production to help overcome water shortages. <br />D - Summer Precipitation – Days with 0.10” or greater (May 1-September 15) <br />Due to data requirements to analyze this variable only two stations in the basin <br />(Alamosa and Great Sand Dunes) met this requirement. An analysis of the values <br />indicates a minimal useful ‘connection at Great Sand Dunes, on the east side of the <br />valley. However, at Alamosa there was some relationship with the AMO with negative <br />values correlating somewhat well with average/above average days with 0.10” of <br />precipitation or greater and vice versa for negative AMO values. Given the lack of <br />stations to analyze with this data, some caution is offered to using this data as a potential <br />‘planning’ tool rather than information of note. <br />E – Naturalized Stream flow Volume (April – September) <br />One of the most important factors in the hydrologic cycle that is observed in the <br />state of Colorado is surface water. This section will briefly outline the ‘resulting’ factor <br />of winter snows and spring precipitation and how directly calculated naturalized runoff <br />might be influenced by the HCI variables. Also the temporal aspect of ‘how’ runoff <br />might be influenced by the HCI variables will be discussed. <br />District 26 <br />The overall stream flow correlations exhibit some interesting connections in the <br />area but one that is most notable is the AMO where negative values tend towards positive <br />values of stream flow. Also of note is the lack of excessively dry years as well with <br />Figure 7 <br />negative compared to positive years (). Secondary, but weaker index values that <br />correlate to stream flow include the ENSO (SOI/MEI) variables as well. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.