My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP13005
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP13005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:36 PM
Creation date
4/1/2008 3:25:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.500
Description
Coordinated Long Range Operation of Colorado River Reservoirs
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/21/2005
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Long-Range Operating Criteria Amended 02/21/2005
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Operating Principles/Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the active water stored in Lake Powell and Lake Mead (for so long as Upper Basin 10- <br />year water delivery obligations are satisfied). <br /> <br />Response: Under the Operating Criteria, Lake Powell storage drops below Lake Mead <br />storage during periods of drought. When there is a return to average or above average <br />inflow, Lake Powell storage recovers faster than storage recovers in Lake Mead. The <br />602(a) Storage requirement allows water storage in Lake Powell to be greater than water <br />storage in Lake Mead in the period following a drought. Maintaining storage equal in <br />Lake Powell and Lake Mead as an operating strategy would be counter to the 602(a) <br />Storage requirement and could put the Upper Basin at risk of not having enough water in <br />storage for future droughts. The Department will continue to address low reservoir <br />storage caused by drought in the Annual Operating Plan consultation process. In <br />addition, see response to Comments No. 34 and 38. <br /> <br />Comment No. 43 - (Letter No. 20): The Operating Criteria of Glen Canyon Dam need to <br />be revisited. When.all needs are considered, it would be better to treat Lakes Mead and <br />Powell more similarly, or better yet, to apply your normal system Operating Criteria to <br />the operation of Glen Canyon Dam. <br /> <br />Response: See response to Comments No. 34,38, and 42. <br /> <br />Comment No. 44 - (Letter No. 21): The technical changes proposed in the current <br />Operating Criteria review seem to make sense in order to keep the document current with <br />regards to updated legislation and rules. <br /> <br />Response: Comment noted. <br /> <br />Comment No. 45 - (Letter No. 21): With the current drought and the ongoing discussions <br />by the seven Colorado River Basin States as to how to cope with low storage levels in the <br />system, it would be appropriate for this review of the Operating Criteria to serve as the <br />current review for at least the next five years. During this time, the seven Basin States <br />will be working together to provide additional guidelines dealing with shortages. . Similar <br />to the Interim Surplus Guidelines process, if and when shortage guidelines are agreed to <br />and given time to develop operational experience, it would be appropriate to again review <br />the Operating Criteria. <br /> <br />Response: See response to Comment No. 35. <br /> <br />Comment No. 46 - (Letter No. 22): Page Electric Utility strongly believes that the water <br />level of Lake Powell should be maintained at or above elevation 3,490 feet to maintain <br />the minimum power pool. <br /> <br />Response: See response to Comments No. 34 and 39. <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.