Laserfiche WebLink
Section 6 <br />Site-Specific Opportunities and <br />Limitations <br />The opportunities and limitations for agricultural water conservation measures vary <br />significantly from basin to basin. In order to calculate volumes and locations of <br />potentially available water, a basin specific analysis will be necessary, a task that is <br />beyond the scope of this paper. A few examples of the basin specific limitations and <br />potential opportunities are noted below. More detailed information on interstate <br />compact requirements can be found in Section 4 of the SWSI report. <br />South Platte <br />^ h1 the South Platte, the compact with Nebraska only requires the delivery of water <br />to one ditch n1 Nebraska under certain conditions during the irrigation season. <br />There are no requirements for delivery during the non-irrigation season. <br />^ The Three States Agreement between Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming and the <br />Department of Interior has certain periodic flow targets and requirements <br />regarding future depletions. <br />^ The conversion to center pivot sprinklers in Water Districts 1, 2, 3, and 64 may <br />result in a reduction of return flows and impacts on alluvial groundwater, which <br />historically were supplied from flood irrigation. <br />^ There is a potential for water conservation measures in Water District 64, especially <br />downstream near the state line if these were implemented in a way that would not <br />impact any Colorado water rights or endangered species flows. <br />Arkansas <br />^ The Arkansas River Compact requires the maintenance of historical streamflow <br />conditions as of the date of the compact. <br />^ The Colorado State Engineer has taken the position that agricultural efficiency <br />improvements in the Arkansas may not result in any reduction of historical return <br />flows as contemplated in the Arkansas River Compact. <br />^ Existing irrigation practices have resulted in return flow s that have raised the water <br />table resulting in non-beneficial CU (as evaporation from the soil surface) and <br />increasing the salinity of both ground water and surface water. Any measures <br />addressing these concerns must be in conformance with the Compact. <br />^ Irrigation of certain lands results in significant impacts to downstream water <br />quality from leaching of metals and salinity. In addition the return flows from <br />irrigation of these lands impacts agricultural production on other lands diverting <br />downstream. <br />DRAFT 6-1 <br />