My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12998
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:32 PM
Creation date
4/1/2008 9:07:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.750
Description
California 4.4 or QSA or Water Plan
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Author
CWCB
Title
California 4.4 Plan / QSA / Water Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.I <br />~ <br /> <br />Imperial water fight nearing a boil <br /> <br />By Dale Kasler and Stuart Leavenworth -- Bee Staff Writers <br />Published 2:15 a.m. PDT Tuesday, June 17,2003 <br /> <br />For months, Southern California has spurned a historic water-sharing agreement with its rural <br />neighbors, a deal that Gov. Gray Davis says is crucial to avoiding a statewide water crunch. <br />Now, some state officials and others say the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California's <br />resistance is tied to a bold effort to seize gobs of agricultural water from nearby Imperial Valley. <br />They say the powerful MWD is reluctant to make peace if it thinks it simply can grab the water it <br />needs. <br />"Part of it is they hope to get water for free," said Richard Katz, a senior adviser to Davis. <br />The situation comes to a head Monday when the U.S. Bureau of Rec1amation will issue the <br />results of a special evaluation of Imperial's irrigation practices. If the bureau finds Imperial is <br />wasteful, that could free up extra water for MWD and its 17 million urban customers. <br />Not surprisingly, MWD is arguing for reducing Imperial's supply. It recently told the bureau that <br />Imperial could surrender 22 percent of its water without skipping a beat. <br />That rankles Imperial water officials, who sense a naked grab for water. <br />"The interesting coincidence is that the amount (MWD) asked Imperial to be cut back is the <br />amount it takes to fill their aqueduct," said Imperial Irrigation District attorney David Osias. <br />MWD denies that's why it's reluctant to ratify Davis' water-sharing agreement. Rather, it says, it <br />objects to Davis' plan to spend public dollars to make the agreement work. <br />This messy Southern California fight has implications for the whole state. If Southern California <br />. can't resolve its water situation, it faces the continued cutoff of up to 800,000 acre-feet of <br />Colorado River water, enough to supply up to 1.6 million households for a year. Although MWD <br />says it can absorb the loss through conservation, many experts say MWD will look to the water- <br />rich rice farms ofthe Sacramento Valley for help, putting new pressure on the overworked <br />Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. <br />MWD already made a deal this year to import more water from the Sacramento Valley, paying <br />millions to rice farmers in a first-of-its-kind voluntary deal. <br />In a weird, almost comical subplot that seems typical of California water fights, the governor <br />tried to kill the transaction last week by refusing to store MWD's water at the state's Lake <br />Oroville reservoir -- meaning the water would flow out the Golden Gate. The U.S. government <br />swam to MWD's rescue, scolded Davis for wasting water and offered to store it at federally <br />owned Lake Shasta until delivery. On Friday Davis said he would cooperate with efforts to move <br />the water south. <br />In any event, the dispute over Imperial's water usage is scaring farmers everywhere. Stuart <br />Somach, a Sacramento lawyer who represents farmers in Northern California and Imperial, said <br />Northern California farmers view MWD and the Bureau ofRec1amation as working in cahoots to <br />grab Imperial's water -- and would think twice about selling their water south again. <br />Farmers "are very wary of the whole thing," Somach said. "They point to it as a cautionary note <br />of what happens when you deal with the big bad Southern California urban entities." <br />The situation represents something of a role reversal for the Interior Department, which directed <br />that more water be sent to desperate farmers in the Klamath River basin last year. This time, <br />Interior, the Bureau ofRec1amation's parent agency, is considering whether to use an obscure <br />facet of Western water law to wrest supplies from Imperial. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.