Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ari;zona,. Central: Calitornia commits to water plan <br /> <br />http://www.azcentral.com/newslI220river.shtml <br /> <br />"Those lakes are at the mercy of Mother Nature," Pearson said. <br />"You can't raise and lower them on a whim. Even the slightest <br />changes can have huge impacts. If you draw Lake Mead down <br />too far, you can't assume a wet year is just around the comer." <br /> <br />Worse, for Pearson and the other states, was that California's <br />initial plan attempted to placate both urban and agricultural <br />users. The other states want to see a proposal that shifts water <br />from farmers to cities in times of drought. <br /> <br />Stakes out his role <br /> <br />Babbitt cautioned the other states about intruding too far into <br />California's internal issues, and he held open the possibility <br />that the lakes may have to be used: "Storage reservoirs by <br />definition rise and fall. That's their purpose. Lake Mead is <br />always fluctuating." <br /> <br />The former Arizona governor has staked out his role in <br />reaching an agreement, proposing a series of rules that would <br />spell out how a surplus will be divided among the states. The <br />rules are meant to help California cut back its use over about <br />15 years. <br /> <br />The other states are willing to help as well, but not until <br />California produces a plan to reduce its water use. After <br />California submitted a proposal that fell short, the other six <br />states fired off a letter demanding a more reasonable plan and <br />asked for a meeting at last week's river conference. <br /> <br />What irked Pearson, Mulroy and others is that the other six <br />states presented a surplus plan more than a year ago, one they <br />all agreed on, one that included a little sacrifice for everybody <br />and one that California promptly ignored. <br /> <br />"There weren't many differences between what they presented <br />this week and what we'd already proposed," Pearson said. "If <br />we all could agree to it, why couldn't they use it?" <br /> <br />Issues are complex <br /> <br />Zimmerman said California wasn't dragging its feet and wasn't <br />trying to avoid its responsibilities. The state's water issues are <br />complex -- just crafting an agreement among three agricultural <br />districts took months and that was only after years of no one <br />even showing up at the table. <br /> <br />"Now we are of one mind, and we have a unified position," he <br />said, "We have always been concerned about what the other <br />states were saying." <br /> <br />He and other officials promised to produce a draft use plan by <br />January and, pending a vote by the state's Colorado River <br />Board, present it to the other six states by the end of that <br />month, The plan will include the specific details of how <br />California will use less water, out-lining target dates arid <br /> <br />3 of4 <br /> <br />12/20/99 9:03 AM <br />