09d

• Board Meeting Date: 3/18/2008
• Description: CWCB Director's Report
• Board Meetings - Doc Type: Memo

Region 2 Ditch Bill Application Processing Status
February 1, 2008
Prior Rights Assertion Cases

ares[

ssertions
Claimed*

Assertion
Evidence is
Uncertain*

Assertion
Evidence is
Insufficient*
Assertion
Relinquished
Upon Easement
Signing*
Assertion is
Potentially Valid,
Applicant Prefers
Easement* Assertion is
Potentially
Valid, Applicant
Prefers
Assertion*
Arapaho Roosevelt 5 1 1
Bighorn 2 1
Black Hills No Assertions
GMUG 24 5 1 55 1 51
Medicine Bow /Rout[
Pike San Isahell Cimeron Comanche 5
Rio Grande 49 2 25
San Juan 131 32 3^ ^ 4 64
Shoshone No Assenians
While River NF 32 2 ^ 6 2^
Assertion Ta[als 248 39 35 55 11 161
See definitions on page 3.
Ditch Bill Easement A lication Cases
A B C D E F G H
Easement
Application Ditch Bill
Total Number of Suspended, Easement Applications
Easement Assertion Application is Application Easement is NEPA Scopinq Easement Easement Easement Processed* (Sum of
Forest lications** Reco nized* * Denied* Uncertain* Valid* Ini[iated* Pre ared* Issued* Consolidated columns A, B, G, H
Arapaho Roosevelt 18 1 3 2 2 1 5 9
Bighorn 5 3 D
Black Hills 1 1 D
GMUG 475 50 73 8 37 6 92 213 336
Medicine Bow / Routt 80 9 45 5 14
Pike San Isahell Cimeron Comanche 21 2 8 5 2
Rio Grande 84 25 1^ 2 11 13 59
San Juan 229 64 41 44 0 38 20 22 127
Shoshone 13 13 D
While River NF 203 20 72 12 16 19 42 31 123
Ditch Bill Easement Totals*** 1129 16D 210 SD 64 65 2D7 287 657
Open Applications 472 Percent of Ditch bill applications*** processed* 58
* See definitions on page 3.
** The number of easement application cases has increased as water rights are divided and sold [a multiple ponies.
*** Total Applications open as of January 1, 2005 to current. A number of Ditch Bill Applications were Processed previous [c January 1, 2005. Those Ditch Bill Applications (Approximately 300) are no[ included in the above totals.
Page 1 of 2