My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12994
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:30 PM
Creation date
3/31/2008 2:54:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.750
Description
California 4.4 or QSA or Water Plan
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Author
Varied
Title
California 4.4 Plan / QSA / Water Plan - Testimonies Regarding California Water Plan / QSA
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />provide the loan guarantees or bond funds by the end of this session. These early termination <br />provisions were unacceptable to the Department of Interior. <br /> <br />The documents approved by lID also included joint and several liability commitments of <br />Metropolitan, Coachella and San Diego for unexpected environmental costs, shortfalls in funding <br />expected environmental costs, and post-QSA environmental legacy costs. This type of <br />commitment was not acceptable to CVWD. Division of future environmental costs among the <br />agencies is still an open issue. <br /> <br />Imperial's definition ofpost-QSA residual environmental costs that the other agencies were <br />expected to fund included coverage for activities Imperial and its farmers could exercise <br />discretion to continue. <br /> <br />lID has proposed covenants for Metropolitan, Coachella and San Diego to not support <br />fallowing after year 15 which have not been agreed to. <br /> <br />Imperial's proposed covenants regarding SB 482(Water Code Section 1013(c)) presumptions <br />exceeded the language of the statute. <br /> <br />There are other drafting issues that the attorneys need to resolve. <br /> <br />Allocation Agreement Issues <br />A condition precedent of the Quantification Settlement Agreement is the Allocation <br />Agreement among the United States, Metropolitan, Coachella and Imperial regarding disposition <br />of water made available as a result oflining the All-American and Coachella Canals. Although <br />significant progress was made on the text of the agreement, there was not agreement upon certain <br />key provisions including the effect of shortages, payment of capital costs to Metropolitan if <br />Metropolitan does not receive water after termination of the QSA, and remedies available to <br />Metropolitan against the United States. <br /> <br />MWD-CVWD issues <br />Coachella and Metropolitan have not completed negotiations regarding a 100 kaf SWP <br />Transfer and Exchange Agreement to provide supplemental water for the Upper Coachella <br />Valley and MWD requests for adjustments in the CVWD QSA water budget. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.