My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12994
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:30 PM
Creation date
3/31/2008 2:54:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.750
Description
California 4.4 or QSA or Water Plan
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Author
Varied
Title
California 4.4 Plan / QSA / Water Plan - Testimonies Regarding California Water Plan / QSA
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Written Statement of <br />Ronald R. Gastelum, Chief Executive Officer <br />For the <br />Metropolitan Water District of Southern California <br /> <br />Before the <br />Senate Agriculture and Water Resources Committee <br />April 29, 2003 <br /> <br />Good Morning. My name is Ron Gastelum and I am the Chief Executive Officer of the <br />Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. We are a supplemental supplier of <br />water for our 26 member public agencies and ;rovide 50-60% of the water ,used by the <br />over 17 million peQple in oUL~,2~Q.-uare ffille service area. <br /> <br />California's plan and efforts to reduce its use of Colorado River water to its basic annual <br />apportionment of 1:..4 million acre-feet absent surplus Colorado River water and unused <br />Colorado River water apportionments of Nevada and Arizona have faced a seemingly <br />endless number of unanticipated challenges and changing conditions. I commend the <br />Governor, his team and the other participants for their efforts to bring a proposal forward <br />in the face of such challenges. <br /> <br />Today, you are being asked to consider almcating funds from Proposition 5OJ,Q help pay <br />the e' ted costs of the proposed Imperial Irrigation District (IID) transfer of Colorado <br />River water to the San Diego County Water Authority (Authority). The transfer is a part <br />of the larger agreement commonly referred to as the Quantification Settlement <br />Agreement (QSA), or the QSA. <br /> <br />You have asked Metropolitan and the other witnesses to respond to certain questions and <br />to explain the consequences to our water supply and water rates depending upon whether <br />the QSA IS executed and California's access to special surplus water under the Colorado <br />~ <br />River Interim Surplus Guidelines is reinstated. We have participated with the Governor's <br />office and the other water agencies in providing a joint response to the Committee's <br />request for detailed background information on the QSA. I have attached to this <br />testimony appendices in response to your specific water supply and water rate questions. <br /> <br />In my testimony I will address your water supply and water rate questions, but will also <br />provide some context to illustrate how we manage our system, and how our Colorado <br />River water supplies fit within that system. This context should help explain our <br />responses to your questions. <br /> <br />Tab 1 in the appendices depicts the mix of water supply resources we are drawing upon <br />to meet water demands in our service area this year. It shows how we plan to manage our <br />resource portfolio whether or not the QSA is executed and the access to special surplus <br />water is reinstated. In ~we would meet about 14% of demands with C 0 River <br />1'\..... <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />.~ <br />""{~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.