Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Our Presentation Will Show <br /> <br />. We have a plan to be at 4.4 mar. when <br />conditions on the River so dictate <br /> <br />. The plan Is viable <br /> <br />. The projects In the plan are real and <br />can be Implemented <br /> <br />. There I, 8 schedule lor the projects to <br />be Implemented <br /> <br />Continue the Dialogue <br /> <br />. We arB committed to working with you <br />to devetop interim surplus crlterla that <br />best meet all at our needs <br />. We euggesl that a technical group be <br />formed 10 work with the Bureau on <br />modeling assumptions and evaluaUng <br />afternative Interim surplus criteria <br /> <br />MWD Colorado River Aqueduct <br />Operations Under a <br />California 4.4 Million Acra-Foot <br />Colorado River Water Use Plan <br /> <br />. UWD Aqueduct operations offer a <br />means to assess California'. Plan <br /> <br />Our Presentation Will Show <br /> <br />(continued) <br /> <br />. The reductions In California's use of <br />Colorado River water are real and <br />measurable <br />. The difference In our Interim surplus <br />criteria and yours is not great <br />. The drawdown of Lakes Mead and <br />Powell under both criteria are <br />comparable and tend to converge after <br />2015 <br /> <br />-,- .- .1.-< <br />-"'< -= ~" .no <br />, --- ~ <br />. . --'-, .,;~~ <br /> <br />..I-.,,-'~~::-'-:..:=~-":.....I '\~ <br />,'. . ,. '=.;.- <br />'; r~ <br />-- ~co\. ~ <br />~:i; <br />.=--J.f; 1 <br />; <br /> <br /> <br />;-=. <br /> <br />MWD Water Supply Operations <br /> <br />. MWD and ita member agencies provide <br />for the coordinated operation of Its <br />Colorado River, State Water Project, and <br />other water suppl5es with local waters to <br />optimize conservation of available <br />supplies for Increased yktld and <br />development of dry year supplies to <br />meet any deficiencies <br /> <br />2 <br />