My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12980
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:27 PM
Creation date
3/31/2008 12:06:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20.C
Description
Imperial Irrigation District (IID);
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/9/1996
Author
Imperial Irrigation District
Title
Water Requirements and Availability Sutdy (draft)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />through October 15. The program resulted in an average water savings of 1.36 acre-feet per acre. <br />(Test Water Conservation Program - Program Description, lID, May 1992.) <br /> <br />To establish such a program, lID would have to formulate rules for participating in the program, <br />sign people up to participate, and then withhold water from those fields for a given number of <br />days after sign-up. In the pilot program, participants were required to keep the field in <br />production until June of the following year. This type of program could be initiated on short <br />notice and would require adoption of the above water savings factor to determine the amount of <br />water conserved. <br /> <br />Cost elements consist of grower costs and revenue impacts, lID revenue loss, and possible <br />compensation for participating growers. Grower costs and revenue impacts result from increased <br />cultural costs, lost production, and savings of production costs; lID revenue loss would come <br />from lower water and power sales. <br /> <br />IV.B.3 Alternate Cropping Patterns <br />Cropping patterns in the Imperial Valley vary according to market demand. Another factor <br />affecting cropping patterns is the presence of pest and/or disease vectors that damage crops <br />grown or once grown in the area. For example, since 1985 the three year weighted average of <br />acreage for garden crops has increased by about 3.0 percent, for field crops by 3.3 percent, and <br />for permanent crops by 10.6 percent. However, many melon varieties once grown in the Valley <br />are no longer viable. <br /> <br />The California Water Plan Update, Bulletin 160-93, discusses alternate cropping patterns (page <br />168). "The option to shift to another crop must be considered with respect to the grower's <br />financial resources, the suitability of climate and soils for the specific crop, and crop marketing <br />conditions. (For many high-valued crops, the necessary market conditions include obtaining a <br />contract with a food processor.) Because of such constraints, land planted to lower-valued crops <br />like pasture or alfalfa may not be a sign of opportunity being ignored." <br /> <br />Draft: Subject To Revision 12/21/95 <br /> <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.