My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12980
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP12980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:34:27 PM
Creation date
3/31/2008 12:06:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20.C
Description
Imperial Irrigation District (IID);
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/9/1996
Author
Imperial Irrigation District
Title
Water Requirements and Availability Sutdy (draft)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Water conservation projects/programs identified and evaluated in the study are shown in Tables <br />ES-2 and ES-3. Table ES-2 focuses specifically on structural and on-farm water conservation <br />projects/programs such as, concrete lining, lateral interceptors, reservoirs, tail water returns <br />systems, drip/sprinkler irrigation, delivery flexibility and others. Table ES-3 evaluates the <br />potential conservation opportunities associated with the reclamation and/or reuse of effluent, <br />drain, ground, river and Salton Sea waters. Table ES-2 also presents the estimated water <br />conservation potential (acre-feet/acre) and the component of water that is being conserved for <br />each structural and on-fann conservation project/program. The projects/programs identified in <br />Table ES-2 are not meant to be all-inclusive. Any verifiable on-farm water conservation practice <br />would be considered for inclusion in a voluntary program. <br /> <br />Because of the interrelationships between water conservation projects/programs, it is important <br />to note that the estimated conservation potentials presented in Tables ES-2 and ES-3 cannot be <br />totaled in order to determine the maximum conservation potential. <br /> <br />Two examples of how conservation projects impact one another are as follows: <br /> <br />1. Implementing subsurface drip irrigation eliminates the generation of tail water and <br />therefore eliminates the option of utilizing a tail water return system (TRS) for the <br />same field to conserve water. <br /> <br />2. Widespread implementation of TRSs and lateral interceptors would significantly <br />reduce the amount of tailwater and operational water to the drains, which would <br />severely limit the conservation potential for reclamation and reuse of drain water. <br /> <br />Conceptual reclamation and reuse projects are further delineated in Table ES-3 by the source of <br />water that the project utilizes (i.e. drain, river, etc.) and the estimated conservation potential. For <br />the purpose of this study, these conceptual projects are assumed to ultimately conserve Colorado <br />River water. <br /> <br />Draft: Subject To Revision 1/3/96 <br /> <br />ES-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.